feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/economic_system_objectives.md

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+---
+entity_slug: economic_system_objectives
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:18:57.651696'
+overall_score: 4.6
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition clearly identifies two specific objectives (providing
+    subsistence for people and generating revenue for public services) rather than
+    using vague language. It's precise and non-circular, though it could be slightly
+    more detailed about how these objectives relate to each other.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's explicit identification of
+    political economy's dual objectives in Book IV. The definition accurately reflects
+    Smith's own framework without introducing external concepts or interpretations.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: '"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement since this represents
+    Smith''s foundational theoretical framework for understanding the purposes of
+    economic systems. It''s a meta-level concept that underpins his entire analytical
+    approach.'
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps clearly to VSM System 5 (identity/policy) as it defines
+    the fundamental purposes and identity of the economic system. These objectives
+    serve as the policy framework that guides all other system functions and operations.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity provides significant explanatory value by establishing the
+    foundational purposes against which economic arrangements can be evaluated and
+    understood. It illuminates the structural logic of Smith's entire analytical framework,
+    though it's more of a foundational principle than a specific mechanism.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Economic System Objectives
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition clearly identifies two specific objectives (providing subsistence for people and generating revenue for public services) rather than using vague language. It's precise and non-circular, though it could be slightly more detailed about how these objectives relate to each other.
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity is directly grounded in Smith's explicit identification of political economy's dual objectives in Book IV. The definition accurately reflects Smith's own framework without introducing external concepts or interpretations.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement since this represents Smith's foundational theoretical framework for understanding the purposes of economic systems. It's a meta-level concept that underpins his entire analytical approach.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps clearly to VSM System 5 (identity/policy) as it defines the fundamental purposes and identity of the economic system. These objectives serve as the policy framework that guides all other system functions and operations.
+
+## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity provides significant explanatory value by establishing the foundational purposes against which economic arrangements can be evaluated and understood. It illuminates the structural logic of Smith's entire analytical framework, though it's more of a foundational principle than a specific mechanism.