feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/economic_system_outcome_measure.md

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+---
+entity_slug: economic_system_outcome_measure
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:19:16.193724'
+overall_score: 2.6
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition is overly broad and vague, essentially describing "any
+    way to measure economic outcomes" without identifying specific metrics or clear
+    boundaries. It conflates measurement tools with assessment processes and lacks
+    the precision needed to distinguish this from general economic evaluation.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: While Smith discusses outcomes of economic systems throughout The Wealth
+    of Nations, he doesn't systematically theorize about "outcome measures" as a distinct
+    analytical category. The entity appears to impose modern evaluation framework
+    concepts onto Smith's more descriptive approach to economic consequences.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity fits within economic analysis but is too abstract to belong
+    to any specific economic domain. It's more of a meta-analytical concept about
+    how to study economics rather than an economic phenomenon itself.
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it concerns
+    monitoring and measuring system performance. It could also relate to S4 (intelligence)
+    in terms of gathering data about environmental effects and system outcomes.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity merely labels the general concept of measuring economic results
+    without illuminating specific mechanisms or providing analytical insight. It doesn't
+    explain how measurement works or what makes certain metrics more valuable than
+    others.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Economic System Outcome Measure
+
+## definition_precision — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition is overly broad and vague, essentially describing "any way to measure economic outcomes" without identifying specific metrics or clear boundaries. It conflates measurement tools with assessment processes and lacks the precision needed to distinguish this from general economic evaluation.
+
+## source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+While Smith discusses outcomes of economic systems throughout The Wealth of Nations, he doesn't systematically theorize about "outcome measures" as a distinct analytical category. The entity appears to impose modern evaluation framework concepts onto Smith's more descriptive approach to economic consequences.
+
+## domain_placement — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity fits within economic analysis but is too abstract to belong to any specific economic domain. It's more of a meta-analytical concept about how to study economics rather than an economic phenomenon itself.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it concerns monitoring and measuring system performance. It could also relate to S4 (intelligence) in terms of gathering data about environmental effects and system outcomes.
+
+## explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity merely labels the general concept of measuring economic results without illuminating specific mechanisms or providing analytical insight. It doesn't explain how measurement works or what makes certain metrics more valuable than others.