feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/economic_system_practice.md

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+---
+entity_slug: economic_system_practice
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:19:51.456189'
+overall_score: 2.6
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition is overly broad and vague, essentially describing "how
+    economics works in practice" without identifying any distinct conceptual boundaries.
+    It reads more like a general description of applied economics than a precise,
+    operationalizable concept.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: While Smith does discuss different economic systems and their practical
+    applications, this entity appears to be a modern analytical construct rather than
+    a concept Smith explicitly develops. The attribution to "Book IV, Chapter 0" is
+    also problematic since Book IV doesn't have a Chapter 0.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: '"Regulation" is a reasonable domain for discussing how economic systems
+    operate in practice, though this concept is so broad it could arguably fit in
+    multiple domains. The placement isn''t wrong but reflects the entity''s lack of
+    conceptual specificity.'
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps well to VSM System 1 (primary operations) as it describes
+    the actual implementation and operation of economic arrangements. It could also
+    relate to S3 (internal regulation) in terms of how systems are monitored and controlled
+    in practice.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity provides little explanatory power beyond stating that economic
+    theories must be implemented in practice. It doesn't illuminate specific mechanisms,
+    structural relations, or causal processes that would enhance understanding of
+    Smith's economic analysis.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Economic System Practice
+
+## definition_precision — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition is overly broad and vague, essentially describing "how economics works in practice" without identifying any distinct conceptual boundaries. It reads more like a general description of applied economics than a precise, operationalizable concept.
+
+## source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+While Smith does discuss different economic systems and their practical applications, this entity appears to be a modern analytical construct rather than a concept Smith explicitly develops. The attribution to "Book IV, Chapter 0" is also problematic since Book IV doesn't have a Chapter 0.
+
+## domain_placement — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+"Regulation" is a reasonable domain for discussing how economic systems operate in practice, though this concept is so broad it could arguably fit in multiple domains. The placement isn't wrong but reflects the entity's lack of conceptual specificity.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps well to VSM System 1 (primary operations) as it describes the actual implementation and operation of economic arrangements. It could also relate to S3 (internal regulation) in terms of how systems are monitored and controlled in practice.
+
+## explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity provides little explanatory power beyond stating that economic theories must be implemented in practice. It doesn't illuminate specific mechanisms, structural relations, or causal processes that would enhance understanding of Smith's economic analysis.