feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/economic_system_transformation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+---
+entity_slug: economic_system_transformation
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:21:36.958939'
+overall_score: 3.4
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition captures a coherent concept of systemic economic change
+    but remains somewhat abstract and general. While it identifies key components
+    (institutions, policies, practices), it could be more precise about what constitutes
+    "fundamental" change versus incremental reform.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity relies heavily on inference from Smith's "distinction between
+    ancient and modern systems" rather than explicit textual discussion of transformation
+    processes. Smith describes different systems but doesn't extensively theorize
+    about the mechanisms or nature of transitions between them.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: '"General Theory" is appropriate since this concept spans across Smith''s
+    analysis of different economic systems and represents a meta-level theoretical
+    construct. It''s not specific to any particular policy area or mechanism.'
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps excellently to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation)
+    as it represents how economic systems adapt to changing circumstances and environments.
+    It also connects to S5 (identity/policy) as transformations involve fundamental
+    changes in systemic identity and organizing principles.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: While the concept helps organize thinking about systemic change in Smith's
+    work, it remains at a high level of abstraction without illuminating specific
+    mechanisms of transformation. It names an important phenomenon but doesn't deeply
+    explain how or why such transformations occur.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Economic System Transformation
+
+## definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition captures a coherent concept of systemic economic change but remains somewhat abstract and general. While it identifies key components (institutions, policies, practices), it could be more precise about what constitutes "fundamental" change versus incremental reform.
+
+## source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity relies heavily on inference from Smith's "distinction between ancient and modern systems" rather than explicit textual discussion of transformation processes. Smith describes different systems but doesn't extensively theorize about the mechanisms or nature of transitions between them.
+
+## domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+"General Theory" is appropriate since this concept spans across Smith's analysis of different economic systems and represents a meta-level theoretical construct. It's not specific to any particular policy area or mechanism.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps excellently to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents how economic systems adapt to changing circumstances and environments. It also connects to S5 (identity/policy) as transformations involve fundamental changes in systemic identity and organizing principles.
+
+## explanatory_value — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+While the concept helps organize thinking about systemic change in Smith's work, it remains at a high level of abstraction without illuminating specific mechanisms of transformation. It names an important phenomenon but doesn't deeply explain how or why such transformations occur.