feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/encroachment_upon_capital.md

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+---
+entity_slug: encroachment_upon_capital
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:23:00.013597'
+overall_score: 4.2
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes encroachment upon capital as the
+    specific process of consuming capital stock through excessive spending, rather
+    than using vague terms. It precisely identifies the mechanism (diverting productive
+    funds to unproductive labor) and the consequence (reduced value-adding labor).
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book II, Chapter
+    3, where he explicitly discusses how prodigality leads to capital consumption
+    and uses the analogy of perverting pious foundations. The entity accurately reflects
+    Smith's specific concerns about capital preservation versus consumption.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: "The placement in the \"Accumulation\" domain is precisely correct, as\
+    \ this concept deals with the negative side of capital accumulation\u2014how capital\
+    \ can be diminished through improper use. This is a core concern within Smith's\
+    \ framework of capital formation and preservation."
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity has moderate VSM relevance, potentially mapping to S3 (internal
+    regulation) as it represents a failure of proper resource allocation controls,
+    or S4 (intelligence) as it reflects poor decision-making about resource deployment.
+    However, it's primarily a descriptive economic process rather than a clear systemic
+    function.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity provides strong explanatory value by illuminating the specific
+    mechanism through which individual financial behavior affects broader economic
+    outcomes. It explains not just what happens (capital reduction) but how it happens
+    (diversion from productive to unproductive uses) and why it matters (reduced national
+    wealth).
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Encroachment Upon Capital
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition clearly distinguishes encroachment upon capital as the specific process of consuming capital stock through excessive spending, rather than using vague terms. It precisely identifies the mechanism (diverting productive funds to unproductive labor) and the consequence (reduced value-adding labor).
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book II, Chapter 3, where he explicitly discusses how prodigality leads to capital consumption and uses the analogy of perverting pious foundations. The entity accurately reflects Smith's specific concerns about capital preservation versus consumption.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+The placement in the "Accumulation" domain is precisely correct, as this concept deals with the negative side of capital accumulation—how capital can be diminished through improper use. This is a core concern within Smith's framework of capital formation and preservation.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity has moderate VSM relevance, potentially mapping to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents a failure of proper resource allocation controls, or S4 (intelligence) as it reflects poor decision-making about resource deployment. However, it's primarily a descriptive economic process rather than a clear systemic function.
+
+## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity provides strong explanatory value by illuminating the specific mechanism through which individual financial behavior affects broader economic outcomes. It explains not just what happens (capital reduction) but how it happens (diversion from productive to unproductive uses) and why it matters (reduced national wealth).