feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/expense_of_justice.md

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+---
+entity_slug: expense_of_justice
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:25:30.012556'
+overall_score: 4.4
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition is precise and captures a distinct concept - the sovereign's
+    specific financial responsibility for maintaining justice administration. It clearly
+    delineates this as protection from "injustice or oppression" rather than using
+    vague terms, though it could be slightly more specific about what constitutes
+    "exact administration."
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book V, Chapter
+    1, where he explicitly discusses the sovereign's duty to establish justice administration
+    as the second primary obligation. The language and conceptual framework align
+    closely with Smith's original exposition of sovereign duties.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is correct, as this represents the
+    sovereign's regulatory function in establishing and maintaining institutional
+    frameworks for justice. This fits perfectly within the broader category of governmental
+    regulation of social and economic relations.
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents
+    the system's mechanism for maintaining internal order and ensuring compliance
+    with established rules. It also has elements of S2 (coordination) in preventing
+    conflicts between societal members.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating the structural
+    mechanism through which civil government maintains social order and protects property
+    rights. It reveals the economic logic behind justice administration as a foundational
+    requirement for market functioning, though it could elaborate more on the specific
+    mechanisms involved.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Expense Of Justice
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition is precise and captures a distinct concept - the sovereign's specific financial responsibility for maintaining justice administration. It clearly delineates this as protection from "injustice or oppression" rather than using vague terms, though it could be slightly more specific about what constitutes "exact administration."
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book V, Chapter 1, where he explicitly discusses the sovereign's duty to establish justice administration as the second primary obligation. The language and conceptual framework align closely with Smith's original exposition of sovereign duties.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+The "Regulation" domain assignment is correct, as this represents the sovereign's regulatory function in establishing and maintaining institutional frameworks for justice. This fits perfectly within the broader category of governmental regulation of social and economic relations.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents the system's mechanism for maintaining internal order and ensuring compliance with established rules. It also has elements of S2 (coordination) in preventing conflicts between societal members.
+
+## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating the structural mechanism through which civil government maintains social order and protects property rights. It reveals the economic logic behind justice administration as a foundational requirement for market functioning, though it could elaborate more on the specific mechanisms involved.