feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/feudal_government_effects.md

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+---
+entity_slug: feudal_government_effects
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:28:15.955167'
+overall_score: 4.2
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition clearly identifies a specific political-economic mechanism
+    where feudal authority structures created incentives for capital concealment rather
+    than productive investment. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct causal
+    relationship between political insecurity and economic behavior.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This concept is well-grounded in Smith's historical analysis of how feudal
+    political structures inhibited capital accumulation through creating uncertainty
+    about property security. Smith explicitly discusses how political violence and
+    arbitrary authority discouraged productive investment in pre-commercial societies.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: While "Regulation" captures the governmental aspect, this entity primarily
+    describes a historical institutional failure that prevented effective regulation
+    and market development. It might be better categorized under institutional or
+    political economy rather than regulation per se.
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it describes how inadequate
+    regulatory/governance structures failed to provide the security necessary for
+    economic system viability. It also touches on S5 (identity/policy) regarding the
+    fundamental institutional arrangements that define system boundaries.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: "This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating a\
+    \ key structural mechanism\u2014how political institutions can systematically\
+    \ undermine capital formation and economic development. It helps explain the historical\
+    \ transition from feudal to commercial society that is central to Smith's analysis."
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Feudal Government Effects
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition clearly identifies a specific political-economic mechanism where feudal authority structures created incentives for capital concealment rather than productive investment. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct causal relationship between political insecurity and economic behavior.
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This concept is well-grounded in Smith's historical analysis of how feudal political structures inhibited capital accumulation through creating uncertainty about property security. Smith explicitly discusses how political violence and arbitrary authority discouraged productive investment in pre-commercial societies.
+
+## domain_placement — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+While "Regulation" captures the governmental aspect, this entity primarily describes a historical institutional failure that prevented effective regulation and market development. It might be better categorized under institutional or political economy rather than regulation per se.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it describes how inadequate regulatory/governance structures failed to provide the security necessary for economic system viability. It also touches on S5 (identity/policy) regarding the fundamental institutional arrangements that define system boundaries.
+
+## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating a key structural mechanism—how political institutions can systematically undermine capital formation and economic development. It helps explain the historical transition from feudal to commercial society that is central to Smith's analysis.