feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/import_restraint.md

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+---
+entity_slug: import_restraint
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:36:00.745798'
+overall_score: 4.4
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition clearly identifies import restraints as government policies
+    limiting foreign goods through specific mechanisms (tariffs, quotas, bans). It
+    avoids circularity and captures a distinct policy category rather than a vague
+    umbrella term.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text, specifically identified
+    as the "second major category of mercantile policy" from Book IV, Chapter 1. The
+    context accurately reflects Smith's critique of these policies as harmful to national
+    wealth.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is precisely correct, as import restraints
+    are quintessentially regulatory policies that government uses to control market
+    access. This fits perfectly within the economic policy framework Smith analyzes.
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: Import restraints map naturally to S3 (internal regulation) as they represent
+    government control mechanisms over economic flows, and potentially to S4 (intelligence/adaptation)
+    as responses to perceived external threats. The regulatory nature makes VSM placement
+    clear and meaningful.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity illuminates a key structural mechanism in Smith's critique
+    of mercantilism, showing how government intervention disrupts natural market processes
+    and international division of labor. It explains both the policy tool and its
+    economic consequences within Smith's theoretical framework.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Import Restraint
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition clearly identifies import restraints as government policies limiting foreign goods through specific mechanisms (tariffs, quotas, bans). It avoids circularity and captures a distinct policy category rather than a vague umbrella term.
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text, specifically identified as the "second major category of mercantile policy" from Book IV, Chapter 1. The context accurately reflects Smith's critique of these policies as harmful to national wealth.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+The "Regulation" domain assignment is precisely correct, as import restraints are quintessentially regulatory policies that government uses to control market access. This fits perfectly within the economic policy framework Smith analyzes.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+Import restraints map naturally to S3 (internal regulation) as they represent government control mechanisms over economic flows, and potentially to S4 (intelligence/adaptation) as responses to perceived external threats. The regulatory nature makes VSM placement clear and meaningful.
+
+## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity illuminates a key structural mechanism in Smith's critique of mercantilism, showing how government intervention disrupts natural market processes and international division of labor. It explains both the policy tool and its economic consequences within Smith's theoretical framework.