feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/inland_duty_drawback.md

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+---
+entity_slug: inland_duty_drawback
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:37:04.918069'
+overall_score: 4.4
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes inland duty drawbacks from customs
+    duty drawbacks, specifying they apply to domestic production duties recovered
+    upon export. The mechanism and purpose are precisely articulated without circularity.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Book IV, Chapter 4, where Smith
+    explicitly discusses inland duties and their drawback mechanisms. The entity accurately
+    reflects Smith's analysis of how these drawbacks prevent internal taxation from
+    hindering exports.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: '"Regulation" is the correct domain placement, as this represents a specific
+    regulatory mechanism governing the interaction between domestic taxation and export
+    policy. It fits squarely within Smith''s discussion of commercial regulations.'
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents a
+    control mechanism that prevents internal processes (taxation) from disrupting
+    external operations (exports). It also has S2 coordination aspects in managing
+    the interface between domestic and foreign trade.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity illuminates an important structural mechanism showing how
+    governments can maintain domestic revenue collection while preserving export competitiveness.
+    It reveals the sophisticated regulatory thinking behind maintaining neutral taxation
+    effects on international trade.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Inland Duty Drawback
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition clearly distinguishes inland duty drawbacks from customs duty drawbacks, specifying they apply to domestic production duties recovered upon export. The mechanism and purpose are precisely articulated without circularity.
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This concept is directly grounded in Book IV, Chapter 4, where Smith explicitly discusses inland duties and their drawback mechanisms. The entity accurately reflects Smith's analysis of how these drawbacks prevent internal taxation from hindering exports.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+"Regulation" is the correct domain placement, as this represents a specific regulatory mechanism governing the interaction between domestic taxation and export policy. It fits squarely within Smith's discussion of commercial regulations.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents a control mechanism that prevents internal processes (taxation) from disrupting external operations (exports). It also has S2 coordination aspects in managing the interface between domestic and foreign trade.
+
+## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity illuminates an important structural mechanism showing how governments can maintain domestic revenue collection while preserving export competitiveness. It reveals the sophisticated regulatory thinking behind maintaining neutral taxation effects on international trade.