feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00
parent 81a4c8796a
commit a9ca0adfcf
986 changed files with 63216 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
---
entity_slug: invisible_hand_mechanism
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:38:39.173641'
overall_score: 4.4
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition clearly captures the core paradox of self-interested behavior
leading to unintended social benefits through market mechanisms. It avoids circularity
and distinguishes this concept from deliberate public welfare efforts.
- name: source_grounding
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This is directly grounded in Smith's famous passage from Book IV, Chapter
2, where he describes how individuals "led by an invisible hand to promote an
end which was no part of his intention." The entity accurately reflects Smith's
actual argument about unintended consequences of self-interest.
- name: domain_placement
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: '"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement as this represents
one of Smith''s foundational theoretical contributions that spans across multiple
economic activities. It''s a meta-principle rather than a specific market mechanism
or policy prescription.'
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 3.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This concept has some relevance to S2 (coordination) as it describes
how individual actions coordinate without central planning, but it's primarily
a theoretical principle about emergent order rather than a specific systemic function.
It operates across multiple VSM levels rather than mapping cleanly to one.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity provides exceptional explanatory power by illuminating the
fundamental mechanism through which decentralized individual decisions can produce
coordinated social outcomes. It explains a core structural relationship in Smith's
economic theory rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
---
# Evaluation: Invisible Hand Mechanism
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
The definition clearly captures the core paradox of self-interested behavior leading to unintended social benefits through market mechanisms. It avoids circularity and distinguishes this concept from deliberate public welfare efforts.
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
This is directly grounded in Smith's famous passage from Book IV, Chapter 2, where he describes how individuals "led by an invisible hand to promote an end which was no part of his intention." The entity accurately reflects Smith's actual argument about unintended consequences of self-interest.
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement as this represents one of Smith's foundational theoretical contributions that spans across multiple economic activities. It's a meta-principle rather than a specific market mechanism or policy prescription.
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
This concept has some relevance to S2 (coordination) as it describes how individual actions coordinate without central planning, but it's primarily a theoretical principle about emergent order rather than a specific systemic function. It operates across multiple VSM levels rather than mapping cleanly to one.
## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
This entity provides exceptional explanatory power by illuminating the fundamental mechanism through which decentralized individual decisions can produce coordinated social outcomes. It explains a core structural relationship in Smith's economic theory rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.