feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/joint_stock_company.md

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+---
+entity_slug: joint_stock_company
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:38:48.224232'
+overall_score: 4.2
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition clearly captures the essential features of joint-stock
+    companies - multiple shareholders contributing capital and sharing profits/losses,
+    often with government privileges. It's precise and non-circular, though could
+    be slightly more specific about the transferability of shares that distinguishes
+    joint-stock from other partnership forms.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text, specifically his analysis
+    in Book IV, Chapter 5 of the white herring fishery joint-stock company as an example
+    of inefficient capital allocation due to government bounties. Smith extensively
+    discusses joint-stock companies throughout the work as concrete organizational
+    forms.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: '"General Theory" is appropriate as joint-stock companies represent a
+    fundamental organizational structure that Smith analyzes across multiple contexts
+    - from trade monopolies to public works. However, it could arguably fit in a more
+    specific domain like "Business Organization" or "Market Structure" if those existed.'
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: Joint-stock companies have moderate VSM relevance as organizational structures
+    that must coordinate shareholders (S2), regulate internal operations (S3), and
+    adapt to market conditions (S4). However, as a structural form rather than a functional
+    process, the VSM mapping is not as natural as it would be for operational mechanisms.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity provides excellent explanatory value by illuminating Smith's
+    key mechanism about how organizational forms interact with government privileges
+    to create inefficient capital allocation. It's not merely naming a phenomenon
+    but explaining a structural relationship central to Smith's critique of mercantilism.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Joint Stock Company
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition clearly captures the essential features of joint-stock companies - multiple shareholders contributing capital and sharing profits/losses, often with government privileges. It's precise and non-circular, though could be slightly more specific about the transferability of shares that distinguishes joint-stock from other partnership forms.
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text, specifically his analysis in Book IV, Chapter 5 of the white herring fishery joint-stock company as an example of inefficient capital allocation due to government bounties. Smith extensively discusses joint-stock companies throughout the work as concrete organizational forms.
+
+## domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+"General Theory" is appropriate as joint-stock companies represent a fundamental organizational structure that Smith analyzes across multiple contexts - from trade monopolies to public works. However, it could arguably fit in a more specific domain like "Business Organization" or "Market Structure" if those existed.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+Joint-stock companies have moderate VSM relevance as organizational structures that must coordinate shareholders (S2), regulate internal operations (S3), and adapt to market conditions (S4). However, as a structural form rather than a functional process, the VSM mapping is not as natural as it would be for operational mechanisms.
+
+## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity provides excellent explanatory value by illuminating Smith's key mechanism about how organizational forms interact with government privileges to create inefficient capital allocation. It's not merely naming a phenomenon but explaining a structural relationship central to Smith's critique of mercantilism.