feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/land_monopolization_effects.md

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+---
+entity_slug: land_monopolization_effects
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:40:14.653359'
+overall_score: 4.2
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition clearly identifies specific economic consequences (reduced
+    agricultural improvement, limited labor mobility, rent extraction) and distinguishes
+    this from natural colonial development patterns. It avoids circularity by explaining
+    the mechanism rather than just restating the term.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This concept is well-grounded in Book IV, Chapter 7, where Smith explicitly
+    discusses how land monopolization in colonies creates European-style landlord-tenant
+    relationships and contradicts the natural advantages of colonial land abundance.
+    The entity accurately reflects Smith's analysis of colonial land policy effects.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: '"Production" is the correct domain assignment since this entity concerns
+    how land ownership patterns affect agricultural productivity, labor allocation,
+    and the fundamental organization of productive activities in colonial economies.'
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity has some VSM relevance as it relates to S1 (primary operations
+    affected by land ownership patterns) and S4 (environmental adaptation through
+    colonial development), but the mapping is not particularly strong or illuminating
+    for understanding viable system dynamics.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity provides genuine explanatory power by identifying a specific
+    mechanism (land concentration) that produces identifiable economic outcomes and
+    explains why colonial economies might fail to achieve their natural developmental
+    advantages. It illuminates structural relationships rather than merely naming
+    surface phenomena.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Land Monopolization Effects
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition clearly identifies specific economic consequences (reduced agricultural improvement, limited labor mobility, rent extraction) and distinguishes this from natural colonial development patterns. It avoids circularity by explaining the mechanism rather than just restating the term.
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This concept is well-grounded in Book IV, Chapter 7, where Smith explicitly discusses how land monopolization in colonies creates European-style landlord-tenant relationships and contradicts the natural advantages of colonial land abundance. The entity accurately reflects Smith's analysis of colonial land policy effects.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+"Production" is the correct domain assignment since this entity concerns how land ownership patterns affect agricultural productivity, labor allocation, and the fundamental organization of productive activities in colonial economies.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity has some VSM relevance as it relates to S1 (primary operations affected by land ownership patterns) and S4 (environmental adaptation through colonial development), but the mapping is not particularly strong or illuminating for understanding viable system dynamics.
+
+## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity provides genuine explanatory power by identifying a specific mechanism (land concentration) that produces identifiable economic outcomes and explains why colonial economies might fail to achieve their natural developmental advantages. It illuminates structural relationships rather than merely naming surface phenomena.