feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00
parent 81a4c8796a
commit a9ca0adfcf
986 changed files with 63216 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
---
entity_slug: landlord_s_share
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:40:42.734820'
overall_score: 4.0
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes the landlord's share from wages
and profits, and specifies it as the portion going to rent after production costs.
It could be slightly more precise about what constitutes "necessary costs of production"
but is otherwise well-defined.
- name: source_grounding
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This concept is thoroughly grounded in Book I, Chapter 11 of The Wealth
of Nations, where Smith extensively analyzes rent as a component of price and
examines how landlords' returns vary with land productivity. The entity accurately
reflects Smith's tripartite division of produce among rent, wages, and profit.
- name: domain_placement
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: '"Distribution" is the correct domain assignment, as this entity directly
concerns how the total product is divided among the three classes (landlords,
laborers, and capitalists). This is a core distributional concept in Smith''s
framework.'
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 2.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity represents a distributional outcome rather than a systemic
function, making it largely VSM-neutral. While it might relate tangentially to
S3 (internal regulation) in terms of how surplus is allocated, it doesn't naturally
map to any specific VSM system.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The entity provides genuine explanatory value by illuminating how agricultural
surplus is distributed and how rent functions as a residual claim on land productivity.
It helps explain the structural relationship between land quality, cultivation
efficiency, and distributional outcomes.
---
# Evaluation: Landlord S Share
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
The definition clearly distinguishes the landlord's share from wages and profits, and specifies it as the portion going to rent after production costs. It could be slightly more precise about what constitutes "necessary costs of production" but is otherwise well-defined.
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
This concept is thoroughly grounded in Book I, Chapter 11 of The Wealth of Nations, where Smith extensively analyzes rent as a component of price and examines how landlords' returns vary with land productivity. The entity accurately reflects Smith's tripartite division of produce among rent, wages, and profit.
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
"Distribution" is the correct domain assignment, as this entity directly concerns how the total product is divided among the three classes (landlords, laborers, and capitalists). This is a core distributional concept in Smith's framework.
## vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0
This entity represents a distributional outcome rather than a systemic function, making it largely VSM-neutral. While it might relate tangentially to S3 (internal regulation) in terms of how surplus is allocated, it doesn't naturally map to any specific VSM system.
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
The entity provides genuine explanatory value by illuminating how agricultural surplus is distributed and how rent functions as a residual claim on land productivity. It helps explain the structural relationship between land quality, cultivation efficiency, and distributional outcomes.