feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/manufacturers_monopoly_power.md

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+---
+entity_slug: manufacturers_monopoly_power
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:42:10.375722'
+overall_score: 4.6
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes manufacturers' monopoly power as
+    a specific form of political-economic influence tied to trade restrictions, avoiding
+    circularity. It could be slightly more precise about the mechanisms through which
+    this power operates, but the core concept is well-delineated.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity is strongly grounded in Smith's actual text, particularly
+    his warnings about manufacturers who secure monopolies through trade restrictions
+    and his comparison of their influence to a standing army. The concept directly
+    reflects Smith's concerns about protectionist lobbying by domestic producers.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The "Regulation" domain is perfectly appropriate, as this entity concerns
+    how manufacturers influence regulatory policy to maintain trade restrictions and
+    import prohibitions. This is fundamentally about the political economy of regulation
+    rather than pure market mechanics.
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as
+    it represents how manufacturers monitor and influence the political environment
+    to maintain favorable policies. It also has relevance to S5 (identity/policy)
+    as it affects the overall policy direction of the economic system.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating the
+    structural mechanism through which trade restrictions persist despite their economic
+    inefficiency. It explains the political economy dynamics that prevent optimal
+    policy implementation, revealing why suboptimal regulations endure.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Manufacturers Monopoly Power
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition clearly distinguishes manufacturers' monopoly power as a specific form of political-economic influence tied to trade restrictions, avoiding circularity. It could be slightly more precise about the mechanisms through which this power operates, but the core concept is well-delineated.
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity is strongly grounded in Smith's actual text, particularly his warnings about manufacturers who secure monopolies through trade restrictions and his comparison of their influence to a standing army. The concept directly reflects Smith's concerns about protectionist lobbying by domestic producers.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+The "Regulation" domain is perfectly appropriate, as this entity concerns how manufacturers influence regulatory policy to maintain trade restrictions and import prohibitions. This is fundamentally about the political economy of regulation rather than pure market mechanics.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents how manufacturers monitor and influence the political environment to maintain favorable policies. It also has relevance to S5 (identity/policy) as it affects the overall policy direction of the economic system.
+
+## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating the structural mechanism through which trade restrictions persist despite their economic inefficiency. It explains the political economy dynamics that prevent optimal policy implementation, revealing why suboptimal regulations endure.