feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/national_animosity_in_commerce.md

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+---
+entity_slug: national_animosity_in_commerce
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:56:41.816184'
+overall_score: 4.6
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes national animosity from other trade
+    concepts by focusing on hostile attitudes that frame trade as warfare rather than
+    mutual benefit. It avoids circularity and identifies specific manifestations like
+    retaliatory restrictions and harm-focused policies.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book IV, Chapter
+    3, where he explicitly discusses how nationalistic hostility drives irrational
+    trade policies. Smith clearly identifies animosity between nations as a key factor
+    that merchants exploit to secure protections.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The "Regulation" domain is perfectly appropriate since this concept deals
+    with how emotional and political factors influence the creation of trade regulations
+    and barriers. It captures the non-economic drivers behind regulatory policy formation.
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents
+    a dysfunction in how nations perceive and respond to their trading environment,
+    treating partners as threats rather than opportunities. It could also relate to
+    S5 (identity/policy) regarding national identity formation.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity provides significant explanatory power by identifying a key
+    psychological and political mechanism that drives economically irrational trade
+    policies. It explains why nations often adopt self-defeating protectionist measures
+    despite clear economic evidence against them.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: National Animosity In Commerce
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition clearly distinguishes national animosity from other trade concepts by focusing on hostile attitudes that frame trade as warfare rather than mutual benefit. It avoids circularity and identifies specific manifestations like retaliatory restrictions and harm-focused policies.
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book IV, Chapter 3, where he explicitly discusses how nationalistic hostility drives irrational trade policies. Smith clearly identifies animosity between nations as a key factor that merchants exploit to secure protections.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+The "Regulation" domain is perfectly appropriate since this concept deals with how emotional and political factors influence the creation of trade regulations and barriers. It captures the non-economic drivers behind regulatory policy formation.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it represents a dysfunction in how nations perceive and respond to their trading environment, treating partners as threats rather than opportunities. It could also relate to S5 (identity/policy) regarding national identity formation.
+
+## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity provides significant explanatory power by identifying a key psychological and political mechanism that drives economically irrational trade policies. It explains why nations often adopt self-defeating protectionist measures despite clear economic evidence against them.