feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/natural_complement_of_riches.md

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+---
+entity_slug: natural_complement_of_riches
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:58:03.599924'
+overall_score: 4.6
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition is quite precise, clearly describing a maximum wealth
+    threshold determined by institutional constraints rather than natural resources.
+    It avoids circularity and captures a distinct concept about institutional limits
+    on economic development.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book I, Chapter
+    8, where he explicitly discusses how China has reached the "full complement of
+    riches which the nature of its laws and institutions permits it to acquire." The
+    entity accurately reflects Smith's own terminology and reasoning.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: '"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement as this concept
+    represents a fundamental theoretical principle about the relationship between
+    institutions and economic limits. It''s a core structural insight rather than
+    a specific mechanism or policy tool.'
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as
+    it concerns how institutional frameworks limit a system's ability to adapt and
+    grow in response to environmental opportunities. It also relates to S5 (identity/policy)
+    regarding fundamental institutional constraints.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating the
+    mechanism through which institutional frameworks can create absolute limits on
+    wealth accumulation, explaining phenomena like economic stagnation in otherwise
+    capable societies. It reveals a structural relationship between institutions and
+    economic potential rather than merely describing surface outcomes.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Natural Complement Of Riches
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition is quite precise, clearly describing a maximum wealth threshold determined by institutional constraints rather than natural resources. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct concept about institutional limits on economic development.
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book I, Chapter 8, where he explicitly discusses how China has reached the "full complement of riches which the nature of its laws and institutions permits it to acquire." The entity accurately reflects Smith's own terminology and reasoning.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement as this concept represents a fundamental theoretical principle about the relationship between institutions and economic limits. It's a core structural insight rather than a specific mechanism or policy tool.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it concerns how institutional frameworks limit a system's ability to adapt and grow in response to environmental opportunities. It also relates to S5 (identity/policy) regarding fundamental institutional constraints.
+
+## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating the mechanism through which institutional frameworks can create absolute limits on wealth accumulation, explaining phenomena like economic stagnation in otherwise capable societies. It reveals a structural relationship between institutions and economic potential rather than merely describing surface outcomes.