feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/natural_liberty_in_banking.md

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+---
+entity_slug: natural_liberty_in_banking
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:59:11.777653'
+overall_score: 4.4
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes natural liberty in banking from
+    complete laissez-faire by specifying "provided basic safeguards are maintained."
+    This captures a distinct concept of regulated freedom rather than being a vague
+    umbrella term.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Book II, Chapter 2 where Smith explicitly
+    discusses banking freedom and uses the fire regulation analogy. The concept accurately
+    reflects Smith's nuanced position on banking regulation.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: '"Regulation" is the correct domain placement as this concept specifically
+    addresses the appropriate scope and limits of government intervention in banking
+    markets. It fits squarely within regulatory theory.'
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it concerns the
+    regulatory framework governing banking operations, and potentially S5 (policy)
+    regarding the principles that should guide such regulation. It has clear VSM relevance
+    rather than being too abstract.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity illuminates an important mechanism in Smith's thinking about
+    how markets can be both free and stable through appropriate regulatory design.
+    It explains the structural relationship between liberty and security in financial
+    systems rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Natural Liberty In Banking
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition clearly distinguishes natural liberty in banking from complete laissez-faire by specifying "provided basic safeguards are maintained." This captures a distinct concept of regulated freedom rather than being a vague umbrella term.
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity is directly grounded in Book II, Chapter 2 where Smith explicitly discusses banking freedom and uses the fire regulation analogy. The concept accurately reflects Smith's nuanced position on banking regulation.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+"Regulation" is the correct domain placement as this concept specifically addresses the appropriate scope and limits of government intervention in banking markets. It fits squarely within regulatory theory.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it concerns the regulatory framework governing banking operations, and potentially S5 (policy) regarding the principles that should guide such regulation. It has clear VSM relevance rather than being too abstract.
+
+## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity illuminates an important mechanism in Smith's thinking about how markets can be both free and stable through appropriate regulatory design. It explains the structural relationship between liberty and security in financial systems rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.