feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: natural_state_of_employments
|
||||
evaluator: null
|
||||
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:01:17.887745'
|
||||
overall_score: 4.4
|
||||
scores:
|
||||
- name: definition_precision
|
||||
value: 4.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: The definition clearly captures a distinct economic concept - the baseline
|
||||
condition where market forces operate without artificial interference. It's precise
|
||||
in describing the mechanism of wage/profit adjustment and compensation of inequalities,
|
||||
though it could be slightly more concise.
|
||||
- name: source_grounding
|
||||
value: 5.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter
|
||||
10, where he explicitly discusses the "natural state" as a theoretical baseline
|
||||
for analyzing how policy interventions create artificial inequalities. The entity
|
||||
accurately reflects Smith's actual argument about perfect liberty and market equilibration.
|
||||
- name: domain_placement
|
||||
value: 5.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: '"General Theory" is the correct domain placement as this represents
|
||||
a foundational theoretical concept that underpins Smith''s broader analysis of
|
||||
wages, profits, and market mechanisms. It''s not specific to any particular industry
|
||||
or policy but serves as a theoretical framework.'
|
||||
- name: vsm_relevance
|
||||
value: 3.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: This concept has moderate VSM relevance as it relates to S2 (coordination/anti-oscillation)
|
||||
through its description of market self-regulation and equilibration mechanisms.
|
||||
However, it's primarily a theoretical baseline rather than an active system component,
|
||||
making it somewhat abstract for direct VSM mapping.
|
||||
- name: explanatory_value
|
||||
value: 5.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: This entity provides significant explanatory power by establishing the
|
||||
theoretical foundation against which Smith measures actual economic conditions
|
||||
and policy effects. It illuminates the fundamental mechanism of market equilibration
|
||||
and serves as a crucial analytical tool for understanding departures from natural
|
||||
market operations.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Evaluation: Natural State Of Employments
|
||||
|
||||
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
The definition clearly captures a distinct economic concept - the baseline condition where market forces operate without artificial interference. It's precise in describing the mechanism of wage/profit adjustment and compensation of inequalities, though it could be slightly more concise.
|
||||
|
||||
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
This concept is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter 10, where he explicitly discusses the "natural state" as a theoretical baseline for analyzing how policy interventions create artificial inequalities. The entity accurately reflects Smith's actual argument about perfect liberty and market equilibration.
|
||||
|
||||
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
"General Theory" is the correct domain placement as this represents a foundational theoretical concept that underpins Smith's broader analysis of wages, profits, and market mechanisms. It's not specific to any particular industry or policy but serves as a theoretical framework.
|
||||
|
||||
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
This concept has moderate VSM relevance as it relates to S2 (coordination/anti-oscillation) through its description of market self-regulation and equilibration mechanisms. However, it's primarily a theoretical baseline rather than an active system component, making it somewhat abstract for direct VSM mapping.
|
||||
|
||||
## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
This entity provides significant explanatory power by establishing the theoretical foundation against which Smith measures actual economic conditions and policy effects. It illuminates the fundamental mechanism of market equilibration and serves as a crucial analytical tool for understanding departures from natural market operations.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user