feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/nominal_measure_of_value.md

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+---
+entity_slug: nominal_measure_of_value
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:02:10.952298'
+overall_score: 4.2
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes nominal measure from real measure
+    of value, specifying that it's a conventional standard (typically money) that's
+    less accurate than labour. The contrast with "real measure" provides good conceptual
+    boundaries, though it could be slightly more precise about what constitutes "conventional."
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Book I, Chapter 5 where Smith explicitly
+    discusses the distinction between real and nominal measures of value, emphasizing
+    money's role as a convenient but fluctuating standard compared to labour. The
+    entity accurately reflects Smith's actual argument about monetary measurement.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The "Exchange" domain is perfectly appropriate since nominal measures
+    of value are fundamentally about how prices are expressed and compared in market
+    transactions. This concept sits at the heart of exchange mechanisms and price
+    theory.
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S2 (coordination)
+    as it provides the standardized measurement system that enables coordination across
+    different market transactions. However, it's somewhat abstract and doesn't clearly
+    embody the cybernetic control functions that make VSM mapping most valuable.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity provides strong explanatory value by illuminating the structural
+    difference between convenient measurement tools and accurate value representation,
+    which is crucial for understanding price mechanisms and monetary theory. It reveals
+    an important tension in how economic systems represent value.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Nominal Measure Of Value
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition clearly distinguishes nominal measure from real measure of value, specifying that it's a conventional standard (typically money) that's less accurate than labour. The contrast with "real measure" provides good conceptual boundaries, though it could be slightly more precise about what constitutes "conventional."
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This concept is directly grounded in Book I, Chapter 5 where Smith explicitly discusses the distinction between real and nominal measures of value, emphasizing money's role as a convenient but fluctuating standard compared to labour. The entity accurately reflects Smith's actual argument about monetary measurement.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+The "Exchange" domain is perfectly appropriate since nominal measures of value are fundamentally about how prices are expressed and compared in market transactions. This concept sits at the heart of exchange mechanisms and price theory.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S2 (coordination) as it provides the standardized measurement system that enables coordination across different market transactions. However, it's somewhat abstract and doesn't clearly embody the cybernetic control functions that make VSM mapping most valuable.
+
+## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity provides strong explanatory value by illuminating the structural difference between convenient measurement tools and accurate value representation, which is crucial for understanding price mechanisms and monetary theory. It reveals an important tension in how economic systems represent value.