feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/policy_closure_concept.md

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+---
+entity_slug: policy_closure_concept
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:06:34.307980'
+overall_score: 2.8
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition is vague and uses circular language ("clear objectives
+    and boundaries" without specifying what makes them clear or how boundaries are
+    determined). The concept of "policy closure" is not a standard economic term and
+    lacks the precision needed to distinguish it from general principles of limited
+    government.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: While Smith does advocate for limited government intervention, he does
+    not articulate a specific "policy closure concept" as defined here. The entity
+    appears to impose modern terminology and framing onto Smith's more nuanced discussions
+    of appropriate government roles without direct textual support.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is appropriate given the focus on
+    government intervention limits. This concept naturally fits within discussions
+    of regulatory policy and the proper scope of government economic activity.
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity maps well to VSM System 5 (identity/policy) as it concerns
+    fundamental policy boundaries and the identity constraints of government economic
+    intervention. It could also relate to S3 (internal regulation) regarding audit
+    and control mechanisms.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 2.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity provides limited explanatory power beyond restating the general
+    principle that government intervention should be limited. It doesn't illuminate
+    specific mechanisms or structural relations that would help understand how such
+    closure operates or why it matters economically.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Policy Closure Concept
+
+## definition_precision — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition is vague and uses circular language ("clear objectives and boundaries" without specifying what makes them clear or how boundaries are determined). The concept of "policy closure" is not a standard economic term and lacks the precision needed to distinguish it from general principles of limited government.
+
+## source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+While Smith does advocate for limited government intervention, he does not articulate a specific "policy closure concept" as defined here. The entity appears to impose modern terminology and framing onto Smith's more nuanced discussions of appropriate government roles without direct textual support.
+
+## domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The "Regulation" domain assignment is appropriate given the focus on government intervention limits. This concept naturally fits within discussions of regulatory policy and the proper scope of government economic activity.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity maps well to VSM System 5 (identity/policy) as it concerns fundamental policy boundaries and the identity constraints of government economic intervention. It could also relate to S3 (internal regulation) regarding audit and control mechanisms.
+
+## explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity provides limited explanatory power beyond restating the general principle that government intervention should be limited. It doesn't illuminate specific mechanisms or structural relations that would help understand how such closure operates or why it matters economically.