feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00
parent 81a4c8796a
commit a9ca0adfcf
986 changed files with 63216 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
---
entity_slug: progressive_state_of_society
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:10:56.645081'
overall_score: 4.0
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes this as a specific state of society
characterized by advancing wealth acquisition, contrasted against stationary and
declining states. It captures a distinct temporal-economic condition rather than
being vague or circular.
- name: source_grounding
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter
8, where he explicitly discusses the progressive state as the happiest condition
for society and contrasts it with stationary and declining states. The terminology
and analysis are authentically Smithian.
- name: domain_placement
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: '"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement as this represents
Smith''s broad theoretical framework about societal development stages rather
than a specific mechanism like wage determination or market operations. It''s
a foundational concept that spans multiple economic phenomena.'
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 2.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity is too abstract and macro-level to map naturally to specific
VSM systems, as it describes an overall societal condition rather than a functional
subsystem. It's more of a system-wide state description than a viable system component.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity provides significant explanatory power by establishing the
theoretical framework for understanding when societies achieve optimal conditions
for prosperity across all social orders. It illuminates the structural relationship
between wealth accumulation dynamics and social welfare outcomes.
---
# Evaluation: Progressive State Of Society
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
The definition clearly distinguishes this as a specific state of society characterized by advancing wealth acquisition, contrasted against stationary and declining states. It captures a distinct temporal-economic condition rather than being vague or circular.
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
This concept is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter 8, where he explicitly discusses the progressive state as the happiest condition for society and contrasts it with stationary and declining states. The terminology and analysis are authentically Smithian.
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement as this represents Smith's broad theoretical framework about societal development stages rather than a specific mechanism like wage determination or market operations. It's a foundational concept that spans multiple economic phenomena.
## vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0
This entity is too abstract and macro-level to map naturally to specific VSM systems, as it describes an overall societal condition rather than a functional subsystem. It's more of a system-wide state description than a viable system component.
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
This entity provides significant explanatory power by establishing the theoretical framework for understanding when societies achieve optimal conditions for prosperity across all social orders. It illuminates the structural relationship between wealth accumulation dynamics and social welfare outcomes.