feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00
parent 81a4c8796a
commit a9ca0adfcf
986 changed files with 63216 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
---
entity_slug: public_revenue_sources
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:13:57.713705'
overall_score: 4.4
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes public revenue sources from other
fiscal concepts and provides specific categories (taxes, fees, rents, charges)
with meaningful criteria for differentiation (economic effects, administrative
requirements). It avoids circularity and captures a distinct analytical framework
rather than a vague umbrella term.
- name: source_grounding
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Book V, Chapter 1 of The Wealth of
Nations, where Smith systematically examines different revenue sources available
to sovereigns and their respective merits. The focus on economic effects and administrative
feasibility directly reflects Smith's analytical approach in this section.
- name: domain_placement
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is highly appropriate, as public revenue
sources are fundamentally about how the state regulates and structures its fiscal
relationship with the economy. This represents a core regulatory mechanism for
funding governmental functions.
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it concerns
the systematic management of resource flows into the governmental system, and
partially to S5 (identity/policy) as revenue choices reflect fundamental policy
decisions about state-economy relations. The mapping is natural rather than forced.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The entity illuminates important structural mechanisms about how different
revenue sources create different economic incentives and administrative burdens,
providing genuine insight into fiscal system design. It goes beyond mere naming
to capture analytical relationships between revenue types and their systemic effects.
---
# Evaluation: Public Revenue Sources
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
The definition clearly distinguishes public revenue sources from other fiscal concepts and provides specific categories (taxes, fees, rents, charges) with meaningful criteria for differentiation (economic effects, administrative requirements). It avoids circularity and captures a distinct analytical framework rather than a vague umbrella term.
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
This entity is directly grounded in Book V, Chapter 1 of The Wealth of Nations, where Smith systematically examines different revenue sources available to sovereigns and their respective merits. The focus on economic effects and administrative feasibility directly reflects Smith's analytical approach in this section.
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
The "Regulation" domain assignment is highly appropriate, as public revenue sources are fundamentally about how the state regulates and structures its fiscal relationship with the economy. This represents a core regulatory mechanism for funding governmental functions.
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it concerns the systematic management of resource flows into the governmental system, and partially to S5 (identity/policy) as revenue choices reflect fundamental policy decisions about state-economy relations. The mapping is natural rather than forced.
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
The entity illuminates important structural mechanisms about how different revenue sources create different economic incentives and administrative burdens, providing genuine insight into fiscal system design. It goes beyond mere naming to capture analytical relationships between revenue types and their systemic effects.