feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: rent_of_land
|
||||
evaluator: null
|
||||
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:17:17.689056'
|
||||
overall_score: 4.0
|
||||
scores:
|
||||
- name: definition_precision
|
||||
value: 4.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes rent as compensation for land use
|
||||
and natural resources, differentiating it from wages and profits. It captures
|
||||
the specific economic concept of land rent without circularity, though it could
|
||||
be slightly more precise about what constitutes "natural produce."
|
||||
- name: source_grounding
|
||||
value: 5.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Book I, Chapter 6 where Smith explicitly
|
||||
introduces rent as the third component of price alongside wages and profits. The
|
||||
definition accurately reflects Smith's discussion of how landlords demand payment
|
||||
for natural produce and exclusive land rights.
|
||||
- name: domain_placement
|
||||
value: 5.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: '"Distribution" is the correct domain placement, as rent of land represents
|
||||
one of the three fundamental ways that value is distributed among different classes
|
||||
(landlords, workers, capitalists). This aligns perfectly with classical economic
|
||||
theory''s treatment of factor payments.'
|
||||
- name: vsm_relevance
|
||||
value: 2.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: Rent of land is primarily a distributional outcome rather than a system
|
||||
function, making it largely VSM-neutral. While it might tangentially relate to
|
||||
S1 as part of operational economics, it doesn't naturally map to any specific
|
||||
VSM system's regulatory or control functions.
|
||||
- name: explanatory_value
|
||||
value: 4.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: This entity provides significant explanatory power by identifying a fundamental
|
||||
mechanism of value distribution in market economies. It illuminates the structural
|
||||
relationship between property ownership and price formation, though it describes
|
||||
a distributional outcome rather than a dynamic process.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Evaluation: Rent Of Land
|
||||
|
||||
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
The definition clearly distinguishes rent as compensation for land use and natural resources, differentiating it from wages and profits. It captures the specific economic concept of land rent without circularity, though it could be slightly more precise about what constitutes "natural produce."
|
||||
|
||||
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
This entity is directly grounded in Book I, Chapter 6 where Smith explicitly introduces rent as the third component of price alongside wages and profits. The definition accurately reflects Smith's discussion of how landlords demand payment for natural produce and exclusive land rights.
|
||||
|
||||
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
"Distribution" is the correct domain placement, as rent of land represents one of the three fundamental ways that value is distributed among different classes (landlords, workers, capitalists). This aligns perfectly with classical economic theory's treatment of factor payments.
|
||||
|
||||
## vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
Rent of land is primarily a distributional outcome rather than a system function, making it largely VSM-neutral. While it might tangentially relate to S1 as part of operational economics, it doesn't naturally map to any specific VSM system's regulatory or control functions.
|
||||
|
||||
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
This entity provides significant explanatory power by identifying a fundamental mechanism of value distribution in market economies. It illuminates the structural relationship between property ownership and price formation, though it describes a distributional outcome rather than a dynamic process.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user