feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/security_preference_capital.md

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+---
+entity_slug: security_preference_capital
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:20:24.504228'
+overall_score: 1.0
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 1.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: There is no definition provided at all, making it impossible to assess
+    precision or conceptual distinctness. The term "Security Preference Capital" appears
+    to be a compound phrase without clear meaning or boundaries.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 1.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: With no definition, context, or source chapter specified, there is no
+    evidence this entity is grounded in Smith's actual text. The terminology does
+    not align with Smith's 18th-century economic vocabulary or conceptual framework.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 1.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The domain is listed as "unspecified," and without a definition, it's
+    impossible to determine what economic or thematic category this entity should
+    occupy. The entity appears to be floating without conceptual anchoring.
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 1.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: Without any definition or context, this entity cannot be meaningfully
+    mapped to any VSM system (S1-S5). It's unclear whether it represents an operational
+    process, coordination mechanism, regulatory function, or strategic element.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 1.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: An undefined entity with no context provides zero explanatory power about
+    economic mechanisms or structural relations. It neither illuminates Smith's concepts
+    nor adds analytical value to understanding "The Wealth of Nations."
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Security Preference Capital
+
+## definition_precision — 1.0 / 5.0
+
+There is no definition provided at all, making it impossible to assess precision or conceptual distinctness. The term "Security Preference Capital" appears to be a compound phrase without clear meaning or boundaries.
+
+## source_grounding — 1.0 / 5.0
+
+With no definition, context, or source chapter specified, there is no evidence this entity is grounded in Smith's actual text. The terminology does not align with Smith's 18th-century economic vocabulary or conceptual framework.
+
+## domain_placement — 1.0 / 5.0
+
+The domain is listed as "unspecified," and without a definition, it's impossible to determine what economic or thematic category this entity should occupy. The entity appears to be floating without conceptual anchoring.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 1.0 / 5.0
+
+Without any definition or context, this entity cannot be meaningfully mapped to any VSM system (S1-S5). It's unclear whether it represents an operational process, coordination mechanism, regulatory function, or strategic element.
+
+## explanatory_value — 1.0 / 5.0
+
+An undefined entity with no context provides zero explanatory power about economic mechanisms or structural relations. It neither illuminates Smith's concepts nor adds analytical value to understanding "The Wealth of Nations."