feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: sovereign_parsimony
|
||||
evaluator: null
|
||||
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:23:15.686041'
|
||||
overall_score: 4.2
|
||||
scores:
|
||||
- name: definition_precision
|
||||
value: 4.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes sovereign parsimony as a specific
|
||||
practice of rulers accumulating treasure through frugality, contrasted with spending.
|
||||
It captures a distinct historical phenomenon rather than being vague or circular.
|
||||
- name: source_grounding
|
||||
value: 5.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's observations in Book IV,
|
||||
Chapter 1 about how European princes no longer accumulate treasure as their predecessors
|
||||
did and his analysis of why this practice has changed in commercial societies.
|
||||
- name: domain_placement
|
||||
value: 5.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: The "Accumulation" domain is perfectly appropriate since this concept
|
||||
deals specifically with the accumulation of treasure/wealth by sovereigns. This
|
||||
is fundamentally about capital formation and saving at the state level.
|
||||
- name: vsm_relevance
|
||||
value: 3.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: This entity has some VSM relevance as it relates to S4 (intelligence/environmental
|
||||
adaptation) in how governments prepare for contingencies, and S5 (identity/policy)
|
||||
in terms of state financial strategy. However, it's more of a historical practice
|
||||
than an active systemic function.
|
||||
- name: explanatory_value
|
||||
value: 4.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: The entity provides genuine explanatory value by illuminating how state
|
||||
financial strategies have evolved with economic development, showing the structural
|
||||
relationship between commercial development and government resource management.
|
||||
It explains a mechanism of state adaptation to changing economic conditions.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Evaluation: Sovereign Parsimony
|
||||
|
||||
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
The definition clearly distinguishes sovereign parsimony as a specific practice of rulers accumulating treasure through frugality, contrasted with spending. It captures a distinct historical phenomenon rather than being vague or circular.
|
||||
|
||||
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's observations in Book IV, Chapter 1 about how European princes no longer accumulate treasure as their predecessors did and his analysis of why this practice has changed in commercial societies.
|
||||
|
||||
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
The "Accumulation" domain is perfectly appropriate since this concept deals specifically with the accumulation of treasure/wealth by sovereigns. This is fundamentally about capital formation and saving at the state level.
|
||||
|
||||
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
This entity has some VSM relevance as it relates to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) in how governments prepare for contingencies, and S5 (identity/policy) in terms of state financial strategy. However, it's more of a historical practice than an active systemic function.
|
||||
|
||||
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
The entity provides genuine explanatory value by illuminating how state financial strategies have evolved with economic development, showing the structural relationship between commercial development and government resource management. It explains a mechanism of state adaptation to changing economic conditions.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user