feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00
parent 81a4c8796a
commit a9ca0adfcf
986 changed files with 63216 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
---
entity_slug: sovereign_parsimony_principle
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:23:08.233621'
overall_score: 3.2
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 3.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition captures a coherent concept about government frugality
contributing to national wealth, but it's somewhat broad and could apply to many
forms of government efficiency. The connection between parsimony and capital preservation
for productive investment provides some precision, though the concept remains
fairly general.
- name: source_grounding
value: 2.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: While Smith does discuss government frugality and criticizes unnecessary
public expenses like gratuitous coinage, the specific formulation of a "Sovereign
Parsimony Principle" as a distinct economic principle appears to be an interpretive
construct rather than something Smith explicitly articulates. The underlying ideas
exist in the text, but this particular conceptual packaging seems imposed.
- name: domain_placement
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is appropriate since this principle
concerns how government should manage public resources and avoid wasteful expenditures.
This fits well within Smith's broader discussion of proper government functions
and fiscal responsibility.
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it concerns
how the sovereign should monitor and control its own resource allocation and spending
efficiency. It could also relate to S5 (identity/policy) regarding fundamental
principles of government fiscal behavior.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 3.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The entity provides moderate explanatory value by connecting government
frugality to broader economic efficiency and capital allocation, but it doesn't
reveal particularly deep mechanisms. It's more of a normative principle than an
explanation of how economic systems actually function.
---
# Evaluation: Sovereign Parsimony Principle
## definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0
The definition captures a coherent concept about government frugality contributing to national wealth, but it's somewhat broad and could apply to many forms of government efficiency. The connection between parsimony and capital preservation for productive investment provides some precision, though the concept remains fairly general.
## source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0
While Smith does discuss government frugality and criticizes unnecessary public expenses like gratuitous coinage, the specific formulation of a "Sovereign Parsimony Principle" as a distinct economic principle appears to be an interpretive construct rather than something Smith explicitly articulates. The underlying ideas exist in the text, but this particular conceptual packaging seems imposed.
## domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0
The "Regulation" domain assignment is appropriate since this principle concerns how government should manage public resources and avoid wasteful expenditures. This fits well within Smith's broader discussion of proper government functions and fiscal responsibility.
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it concerns how the sovereign should monitor and control its own resource allocation and spending efficiency. It could also relate to S5 (identity/policy) regarding fundamental principles of government fiscal behavior.
## explanatory_value — 3.0 / 5.0
The entity provides moderate explanatory value by connecting government frugality to broader economic efficiency and capital allocation, but it doesn't reveal particularly deep mechanisms. It's more of a normative principle than an explanation of how economic systems actually function.