feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: standard_weight_of_coin
|
||||
evaluator: null
|
||||
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:24:53.662979'
|
||||
overall_score: 4.4
|
||||
scores:
|
||||
- name: definition_precision
|
||||
value: 4.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: The definition clearly specifies what standard weight of coin means -
|
||||
the officially designated weight and fineness of precious metal in coins. It avoids
|
||||
circularity and captures a distinct, measurable concept rather than a vague umbrella
|
||||
term.
|
||||
- name: source_grounding
|
||||
value: 5.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Smith's text, particularly in Book
|
||||
I, Chapter 5 where he extensively discusses how coins' actual weight deviates
|
||||
from their standard weight through wear and clipping, affecting their reliability
|
||||
as measures of value. Smith explicitly addresses this as a fundamental monetary
|
||||
issue.
|
||||
- name: domain_placement
|
||||
value: 5.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is highly appropriate since standard
|
||||
weight of coin represents a government regulatory standard that must be established,
|
||||
maintained, and enforced. This is clearly a regulatory rather than market-driven
|
||||
concept.
|
||||
- name: vsm_relevance
|
||||
value: 4.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents
|
||||
a regulatory standard that requires monitoring and enforcement to maintain system
|
||||
integrity. It also has some S2 relevance as deviations from standard weight create
|
||||
coordination problems in exchange.
|
||||
- name: explanatory_value
|
||||
value: 4.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: This entity illuminates a crucial mechanism in monetary systems - how
|
||||
physical standards enable money to function reliably as a measure of value and
|
||||
medium of exchange. It explains the structural relationship between regulatory
|
||||
standards and monetary stability rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Evaluation: Standard Weight Of Coin
|
||||
|
||||
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
The definition clearly specifies what standard weight of coin means - the officially designated weight and fineness of precious metal in coins. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct, measurable concept rather than a vague umbrella term.
|
||||
|
||||
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
This concept is directly grounded in Smith's text, particularly in Book I, Chapter 5 where he extensively discusses how coins' actual weight deviates from their standard weight through wear and clipping, affecting their reliability as measures of value. Smith explicitly addresses this as a fundamental monetary issue.
|
||||
|
||||
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
The "Regulation" domain assignment is highly appropriate since standard weight of coin represents a government regulatory standard that must be established, maintained, and enforced. This is clearly a regulatory rather than market-driven concept.
|
||||
|
||||
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents a regulatory standard that requires monitoring and enforcement to maintain system integrity. It also has some S2 relevance as deviations from standard weight create coordination problems in exchange.
|
||||
|
||||
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
This entity illuminates a crucial mechanism in monetary systems - how physical standards enable money to function reliably as a measure of value and medium of exchange. It explains the structural relationship between regulatory standards and monetary stability rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user