feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00
parent 81a4c8796a
commit a9ca0adfcf
986 changed files with 63216 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
---
entity_slug: stock_of_the_farmer
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:26:10.821276'
overall_score: 4.4
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition clearly identifies specific components (implements, animals,
provisions) and distinguishes this as capital investment rather than just any
farm resources. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct economic concept
of productive capital in agriculture.
- name: source_grounding
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's discussion in Book I, Chapter
6, where he explicitly addresses how agricultural prices must compensate for the
farmer's capital investment in implements and livestock. The concept emerges naturally
from Smith's analysis rather than being imposed.
- name: domain_placement
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: Placement in the "Accumulation" domain is precisely correct, as this
represents capital formation and investment in productive assets. The farmer's
stock is a clear example of accumulated capital being deployed for future production.
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity maps well to S1 (primary operations) as the basic productive
resources of agricultural operations, and potentially to S3 (internal regulation)
regarding capital maintenance and replacement decisions. It has clear operational
relevance within the VSM framework.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: "The entity illuminates an important mechanism in Smith's economic theory\u2014\
how capital investment creates claims on output that must be satisfied through\
\ pricing. It explains the structural relationship between capital deployment\
\ and price formation in agriculture."
---
# Evaluation: Stock Of The Farmer
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
The definition clearly identifies specific components (implements, animals, provisions) and distinguishes this as capital investment rather than just any farm resources. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct economic concept of productive capital in agriculture.
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's discussion in Book I, Chapter 6, where he explicitly addresses how agricultural prices must compensate for the farmer's capital investment in implements and livestock. The concept emerges naturally from Smith's analysis rather than being imposed.
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
Placement in the "Accumulation" domain is precisely correct, as this represents capital formation and investment in productive assets. The farmer's stock is a clear example of accumulated capital being deployed for future production.
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
This entity maps well to S1 (primary operations) as the basic productive resources of agricultural operations, and potentially to S3 (internal regulation) regarding capital maintenance and replacement decisions. It has clear operational relevance within the VSM framework.
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
The entity illuminates an important mechanism in Smith's economic theory—how capital investment creates claims on output that must be satisfied through pricing. It explains the structural relationship between capital deployment and price formation in agriculture.