feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/university_of_trades.md

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+---
+entity_slug: university_of_trades
+evaluator: null
+evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:35:33.643110'
+overall_score: 4.2
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition is precise and captures a distinct historical concept
+    - the medieval incorporation system that applied to both trades and academic institutions.
+    The parallel between seven-year apprenticeships and academic terms provides clear
+    specificity.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter
+    10, where he explicitly discusses the etymological connection between trade incorporations
+    and universities. The historical terminology and Smith's argument about apprenticeship
+    duration are clearly sourced.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The "Regulation" domain is perfectly appropriate, as this entity concerns
+    the institutional and legal framework governing trade practices through incorporation.
+    It directly relates to Smith's analysis of regulatory structures affecting labor
+    markets.
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S3 (internal
+    regulation) as it describes historical regulatory frameworks for trades. However,
+    it's somewhat abstract as a historical concept rather than an active economic
+    mechanism.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity provides significant explanatory value by illuminating the
+    historical origins of trade regulation and supporting Smith's argument that apprenticeship
+    requirements lack rational economic justification. It reveals the structural parallel
+    between different types of medieval incorporations.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: University Of Trades
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition is precise and captures a distinct historical concept - the medieval incorporation system that applied to both trades and academic institutions. The parallel between seven-year apprenticeships and academic terms provides clear specificity.
+
+## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter 10, where he explicitly discusses the etymological connection between trade incorporations and universities. The historical terminology and Smith's argument about apprenticeship duration are clearly sourced.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+The "Regulation" domain is perfectly appropriate, as this entity concerns the institutional and legal framework governing trade practices through incorporation. It directly relates to Smith's analysis of regulatory structures affecting labor markets.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S3 (internal regulation) as it describes historical regulatory frameworks for trades. However, it's somewhat abstract as a historical concept rather than an active economic mechanism.
+
+## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity provides significant explanatory value by illuminating the historical origins of trade regulation and supporting Smith's argument that apprenticeship requirements lack rational economic justification. It reveals the structural parallel between different types of medieval incorporations.