feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
entity_slug: wages_of_labour
|
||||
evaluator: null
|
||||
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:37:54.044946'
|
||||
overall_score: 4.2
|
||||
scores:
|
||||
- name: definition_precision
|
||||
value: 4.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes wages as compensation for labor
|
||||
from other price components (profits, rent) and includes specific elements like
|
||||
time, hardship, and skill allowances. It avoids circularity by defining wages
|
||||
in terms of their compensatory function rather than simply as "what workers earn."
|
||||
- name: source_grounding
|
||||
value: 5.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Book I, Chapter 6 of The Wealth
|
||||
of Nations, where Smith explicitly discusses wages as one of the three component
|
||||
parts of price. The distinction from profits and rent, and the discussion of regulation
|
||||
principles, are core elements of Smith's analysis.
|
||||
- name: domain_placement
|
||||
value: 5.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: '"Distribution" is the correct domain placement, as wages represent how
|
||||
the value created in production is distributed among the factors of production
|
||||
(labor, capital, land). This aligns perfectly with classical economic theory''s
|
||||
treatment of factor payments.'
|
||||
- name: vsm_relevance
|
||||
value: 3.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: Wages have some VSM relevance as they relate to S1 (operational compensation
|
||||
mechanisms) and potentially S3 (internal resource allocation), but the concept
|
||||
is more naturally economic than cybernetic. The mapping to VSM systems requires
|
||||
interpretation rather than being immediately apparent.
|
||||
- name: explanatory_value
|
||||
value: 4.0
|
||||
max_value: 5.0
|
||||
rationale: This entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating how labor
|
||||
is compensated within the price mechanism and how this differs from other factor
|
||||
payments. It reveals structural relations in the economy's distributive system
|
||||
rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Evaluation: Wages Of Labour
|
||||
|
||||
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
The definition clearly distinguishes wages as compensation for labor from other price components (profits, rent) and includes specific elements like time, hardship, and skill allowances. It avoids circularity by defining wages in terms of their compensatory function rather than simply as "what workers earn."
|
||||
|
||||
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
This concept is directly grounded in Book I, Chapter 6 of The Wealth of Nations, where Smith explicitly discusses wages as one of the three component parts of price. The distinction from profits and rent, and the discussion of regulation principles, are core elements of Smith's analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
"Distribution" is the correct domain placement, as wages represent how the value created in production is distributed among the factors of production (labor, capital, land). This aligns perfectly with classical economic theory's treatment of factor payments.
|
||||
|
||||
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
Wages have some VSM relevance as they relate to S1 (operational compensation mechanisms) and potentially S3 (internal resource allocation), but the concept is more naturally economic than cybernetic. The mapping to VSM systems requires interpretation rather than being immediately apparent.
|
||||
|
||||
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
||||
|
||||
This entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating how labor is compensated within the price mechanism and how this differs from other factor payments. It reveals structural relations in the economy's distributive system rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user