feat(infospace): evaluate 3 missing WoN entities (C.1)

Fills the 988 entity / 985 evaluation gap in the Wealth of Nations
infospace. Entities advanced_state_of_society, bank_notes, and
bank_systemic_risk_management had no evaluation files; runs through
Gemini (2.5-flash / 2.5-flash-lite for the last one, which hit the
free-tier RPM limit) bring the eval count to 988.

per_entity_mean nudged from 3.955635 to 3.95668; viability still
6/6 PASS.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/bank_systemic_risk_management.md

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+---
+entity_slug: bank_systemic_risk_management
+evaluator: gemini-2.5-flash-lite
+evaluated_at: '2026-04-21T21:49:35.222637'
+overall_score: 4.0
+scores:
+- name: definition_precision
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The definition is precise and clearly outlines the purpose of bank systemic
+    risk management. It avoids being an overly broad umbrella term.
+- name: source_grounding
+  value: 3.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: While the concept of managing risks to the banking system is present
+    in Book II, Chapter 2, the explicit framing of "systemic risk management" as a
+    distinct entity with specific practices might be a slight abstraction beyond Smith's
+    direct terminology.
+- name: domain_placement
+  value: 5.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The "Regulation" domain is highly appropriate. Managing systemic risk
+    is fundamentally a regulatory concern aimed at ensuring the stability of the financial
+    system.
+- name: vsm_relevance
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: This entity strongly maps to VSM System 3 (Internal Regulation/Audit)
+    as it involves monitoring and controlling internal operations to prevent systemic
+    failures. It also has elements of System 5 (Policy) in setting overall stability
+    goals.
+- name: explanatory_value
+  value: 4.0
+  max_value: 5.0
+  rationale: The entity provides good explanatory value by highlighting a crucial
+    mechanism for maintaining financial stability. It explains *how* the banking system
+    can be protected from cascading failures.
+---
+
+# Evaluation: Bank Systemic Risk Management
+
+## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The definition is precise and clearly outlines the purpose of bank systemic risk management. It avoids being an overly broad umbrella term.
+
+## source_grounding — 3.0 / 5.0
+
+While the concept of managing risks to the banking system is present in Book II, Chapter 2, the explicit framing of "systemic risk management" as a distinct entity with specific practices might be a slight abstraction beyond Smith's direct terminology.
+
+## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
+
+The "Regulation" domain is highly appropriate. Managing systemic risk is fundamentally a regulatory concern aimed at ensuring the stability of the financial system.
+
+## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+This entity strongly maps to VSM System 3 (Internal Regulation/Audit) as it involves monitoring and controlling internal operations to prevent systemic failures. It also has elements of System 5 (Policy) in setting overall stability goals.
+
+## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
+
+The entity provides good explanatory value by highlighting a crucial mechanism for maintaining financial stability. It explains *how* the banking system can be protected from cascading failures.