Complete State Hub bootstrap workplans (WP-0001)

- Review integration files; fill SCOPE where templated
- Document dev workflow in stack-and-commands.md
- Seed WP-0002 implementation workplan; mark bootstrap finished
- Hub sync via fix-consistency

.claude/rules/agents.md

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+## Kaizen Agents
+
+Specialized agent personas available on demand via the state-hub MCP.
+
+**Discover:** `list_kaizen_agents()` — returns all agents with name, description, category
+**Load:** `get_kaizen_agent("tdd-workflow")` — returns full instructions; read and follow them
+
+Common agents:
+
+| Agent | Category | When to use |
+|-------|----------|-------------|
+| `tdd-workflow` | testing | Step-by-step TDD8 workflow for any feature |
+| `code-refactoring` | quality | Code quality analysis and safe refactoring |
+| `test-maintenance` | testing | Diagnose and fix failing tests |
+| `requirements-engineering` | process | Prevent interface/mock mismatches upfront |
+| `keepaTodofile` | process | Maintain TODO.md during work |
+| `project-management` | process | Track status, determine next steps |
+| `datamodel-optimization` | quality | Optimize dataclasses and data structures |
+
+All 17 agents: call `list_kaizen_agents()` for the full list.

.claude/rules/architecture.md

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+## Architecture
+
+<!-- TODO: Describe the key design decisions and component structure.
+     Key modules, data flows, external integrations, state machines, etc. -->
+
+## Quick Reference
+
+`~/state-hub/mcp_server/TOOLS.md` — MCP tool reference

.claude/rules/credential-routing.md

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+# Credential and access routing
+
+**Audience:** Codex, Claude Code, Grok, and custodian agents that call **llm-connect**
+for inference. Run this check **before** requesting secrets, API keys, SSH access,
+login tokens, or database passwords — in any repo, not only `ops-warden`.
+
+ops-warden **issues SSH certificates only** (`warden sign`, `cert_command`). Every
+other credential need belongs to another subsystem. **Do not** message
+`ops-warden` on State Hub expecting a secret value; the reply is a pointer, not a key.
+
+### Lookup (do this first)
+
+```bash
+warden route find "<describe your need>" --json
+warden route show <catalog-id> --json
+```
+
+Requires the `warden` CLI from `~/ops-warden` (`uv tool install .` or `uv run warden`).
+
+| Agent runtime | How to orient |
+| --- | --- |
+| **Codex / Grok** (shell, HTTP State Hub) | `warden route` commands above; inbox `to_agent=markitect-main` is for coordination, not secret vending |
+| **Claude Code** (MCP when available) | `get_domain_summary("custodian")` for workstreams; **still** use `warden route` for credential ownership |
+| **llm-connect** (inference service) | Never put secret retrieval in prompts; route custody to OpenBao/operator paths surfaced by `warden route` |
+
+### Quick routing table
+
+| I need… | Owner | ops-warden executes? |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| SSH cert (`adm`/`agt`/`atm`) | ops-warden | **Yes** — `warden sign` |
+| API key, DB password, provider token | OpenBao (`railiance-platform`) | No — route only |
+| Login / OIDC / MFA | key-cape / Keycloak | No — route only |
+| Authorization decision | flex-auth | No — route only |
+| activity-core → issue-core emission | activity-core + issue-core | No — `warden route show activity-core-issue-sink` |
+| SSH tunnel | ops-bridge (+ `cert_command` from warden) | No — route only |
+
+### Anti-patterns (do not do these)
+
+- `POST /messages/` to `ops-warden` asking for `ISSUE_CORE_API_KEY`, `OPENROUTER_API_KEY`, etc.
+- Inventing `warden secret`, `warden login`, `warden bao`, `warden tunnel` — they do not exist
+- Pasting secrets into Git, State Hub, workplans, logs, or chat
+
+### Other capabilities (reuse-surface)
+
+Non-credential capabilities are usually discovered through **reuse-surface** federation
+(`reuse-surface` registry / `capability.*` indexes). Credential routing is inlined in
+every repo's agent instructions because it is high-frequency, high-risk, and easy to
+get wrong.
+
+**Canon:** `~/ops-warden/wiki/CredentialRouting.md` · catalog `~/ops-warden/registry/routing/catalog.yaml`

.claude/rules/first-session.md

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+## First Session Protocol
+
+Triggered when `get_domain_summary("communication")` shows **no workstreams**.
+The project is registered but work has not yet been structured.
+
+**Step 1 — Read, don't write**
+- `~/the-custodian/canon/projects/communication/project_charter_v0.1.md` — purpose, scope
+- `~/the-custodian/canon/projects/communication/roadmap_v0.1.md` — planned phases
+- Scan repo root: README, directory structure, existing code or docs
+
+**Step 2 — Survey in-progress work**
+Look for TODOs, open branches, half-finished files. Note done vs. started but incomplete.
+
+**Step 3 — Propose workstreams to Bernd**
+Propose 1–3 workstreams — each a coherent strand, weeks to months, anchored to a
+roadmap phase. **Wait for approval before creating.**
+
+**Step 4 — Create workplan file first, then DB record (ADR-001)**
+```
+workplans/MARKITECT-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md   ← write this first
+```
+Then register in the hub:
+```
+create_workstream(topic_id="36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc", title="...", owner="...", description="...")
+create_task(workstream_id="<id>", title="...", priority="high|medium|low")
+```
+
+**Step 5 — Record the setup**
+```
+add_progress_event(
+    summary="First session: structured communication into N workstreams, M tasks",
+    event_type="milestone",
+    topic_id="36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc",
+    detail={"workstreams": [...], "tasks_created": M}
+)
+```
+
+<!-- Delete or archive this file once past first session -->

.claude/rules/repo-boundary.md

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+## Repo boundary
+
+This repo owns **Markitect Main** only. It does not own:
+
+<!-- TODO: List what belongs in adjacent repos, e.g.:
+- SSH key management → railiance-infra/
+- State hub code     → state-hub/
+-->

.claude/rules/repo-identity.md

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+**Purpose:** Markitect Main - (fill in purpose)
+
+**Domain:** communication
+**Repo slug:** markitect-main
+**Topic ID:** 36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc

.claude/rules/session-protocol.md

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+## Session Protocol
+
+Dev Hub (State Hub API): http://127.0.0.1:8000
+MCP server name in `~/.claude.json`: `dev-hub`
+
+**Step 1 — Orient**
+
+Read the offline-safe brief first — it works without a live hub connection:
+```bash
+cat .custodian-brief.md
+```
+Then call the MCP tool for richer cross-domain context when MCP tools are exposed:
+```
+get_domain_summary("communication")
+```
+If MCP tools are unavailable in the current agent session, use the REST API:
+```bash
+curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8000/state/summary" | python3 -m json.tool
+```
+If the hub is offline: `cd ~/state-hub && make api`
+
+**Step 2 — Check inbox**
+With MCP tools:
+```
+get_messages(to_agent="markitect-main", unread_only=True)
+```
+Mark read with `mark_message_read(message_id)`. Reply or act on coordination
+requests before proceeding.
+
+Without MCP tools:
+```bash
+curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8000/messages/?to_agent=markitect-main&unread_only=true" \
+  | python3 -m json.tool
+curl -s -X PATCH "http://127.0.0.1:8000/messages/<id>/read" \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{}'
+```
+
+**Step 3 — Scan workplans**
+```bash
+ls workplans/
+```
+For each file with `status: ready`, `active`, or `blocked`, note pending
+`wait`/`todo`/`progress` tasks.
+
+**Step 4 — Present brief**
+
+1. **Active workstreams** for `communication` — title, task counts, blocking decisions
+2. **Pending tasks** from `workplans/` + any `[repo:markitect-main]` hub tasks
+3. **Goal guidance** — if `goal_guidance` in summary:
+   - `needs_workplan`: surface as top action — *"Repo goal '{title}' has no workplan yet"*
+   - `alignment_warnings`: flag if active work is not aligned with current goal
+4. **Suggested next action** — highest-priority open item
+5. **SBOM status** — flag if `last_sbom_at` is unset for this repo
+
+If no workstreams: follow First Session Protocol (`first-session.md`).
+
+**During work:** `record_decision()` · `add_progress_event()` · `resolve_decision()`
+
+> State Hub is a *read model*. Bootstrap tools (`create_workstream`, `create_task`)
+> are First Session Protocol only. Work structure belongs in repo files (ADR-001).
+
+**Session close:**
+With MCP tools:
+```
+add_progress_event(summary="...", topic_id="36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc", workstream_id="<uuid>")
+```
+Without MCP tools:
+```bash
+curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8000/progress/ \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
+  -d '{"topic_id":"36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc","workstream_id":"<uuid>","event_type":"note","summary":"what changed","author":"codex"}'
+```
+If workplan files were modified, ensure the local copy is up to date first:
+```bash
+git -C <repo_path> pull --ff-only
+cd ~/state-hub && make fix-consistency REPO=markitect-main
+```
+For repos where implementation runs on a remote machine (e.g. CoulombCore),
+use the combined target which pulls before fixing:
+```bash
+cd ~/state-hub && make fix-consistency-remote REPO=markitect-main
+```
+**C-15** (DB task ahead of file) is normal in multi-machine workflows — writeback
+will sync the file to match DB.  **C-16** (repo behind remote) blocks all writes
+until you pull — intentional to prevent clobbering remote progress.

.claude/rules/stack-and-commands.md

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+## Stack
+
+- **Language:** Python 3.12+ (monorepo) + JavaScript UI (testdrive-jsui)
+- **Key deps:** uv/pip, pytest, npm; see `pyproject.toml`, `package.json`, `Makefile`
+
+## Dev Commands
+
+```bash
+make setup
+make test
+make test-js
+make test-all
+make lint
+make build
+make help
+```

.claude/rules/workplan-convention.md

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+## Workplan Convention (ADR-001)
+
+File location: `workplans/MARKITECT-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`
+ID prefix: `MARKITECT-WP-`
+
+Work items originate as files in this repo **before** being registered in the hub.
+
+Canonical workplan/workstream frontmatter statuses are:
+`proposed`, `ready`, `active`, `blocked`, `backlog`, `finished`, `archived`.
+Use `proposed` for a newly drafted plan, `ready` after review against current
+repo state, and `finished` when implementation is complete. `stalled` and
+`needs_review` are derived health labels, not stored statuses.
+
+Closed workplans may be moved to `workplans/archived/` with a completion-date
+prefix: `YYMMDD-MARKITECT-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`. The frontmatter id remains
+unchanged; the prefix is only for quick visual reference.
+
+Small opportunistic tasks discovered during another session use **Ad Hoc Tasks**:
+`workplans/ADHOC-YYYY-MM-DD.md`, workstream slug `adhoc-YYYY-MM-DD`, and task ids
+`ADHOC-YYYY-MM-DD-T01`, `T02`, etc. Use adhocs only for low-risk work completed
+directly. Promote anything requiring analysis, design, approval, dependencies, or
+multiple planned phases into a normal workplan.
+
+Ecosystem todos from other agents arrive as `[repo:markitect-main]` hub tasks —
+visible at session start. Pick one up by creating the workplan file, then registering
+the workstream.
+
+Task blocks use this shape:
+
+```task
+id: MARKITECT-WP-NNNN-T01
+status: wait | todo | progress | done | cancel
+priority: high | medium | low
+state_hub_task_id: "<uuid>"         # written by fix-consistency — do not edit
+```
+
+Status progression is `todo` → `progress` → `done`; use `wait` for waiting or
+blocked work and `cancel` for stopped work.
+
+<!-- Ralph Loop rules and HEUREKA sequence: ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md — do not duplicate here -->

.custodian-brief.md

@@ -1,42 +1,18 @@
 <!-- custodian-brief: generated by fix-consistency — do not edit manually -->
-# Custodian Brief — markitect-project
+# Custodian Brief — markitect-main
 
-**Domain:** markitect  
+**Domain:** communication  
-**Last synced:** 2026-04-21 22:28 UTC  
+**Last synced:** 2026-06-22 21:32 UTC  
 **State Hub:** http://127.0.0.1:8000 *(adjust if running on a remote machine)*
 
 ## Active Workstreams
 
-### TestDrive-JSUI — npm Publication
+*(none — repo may need first-session setup)*
-Progress: 0/9 done  |  workstream_id: `e203d487-01f1-494a-b14d-a436241a4c01`
-
-**Open tasks:**
-- · P.1 — Decide repository structure (monorepo vs standalone)  `81c03377`
-- · P.2 — Verify Markitect integration still works  `f518601b`
-- · P.3 — Resolve STANDALONE_PLAN.md status  `d700098c`
-- · P.4 — Pack and dry-run publish  `94dd2a30`
-- · P.5 — Create v1.0.0 release tag  `d7c2ce00`
-- · P.6 — Publish to npm and verify CDN  `8bcde75e`
-- · P.7 — Fresh install test in clean environment  `61d14b53`
-- … and 2 more open tasks
-
-### Infospace Tooling — Stage 3 Close-out
-Progress: 0/8 done  |  workstream_id: `830c888e-e1d4-43e6-8093-9b61e7578257`
-
-**Open tasks:**
-- · C.1 — Evaluate the 3 missing entities  `0fa8f461`
-- · C.2 — Run eval-summary and verify viability (6/6 PASS)  `ba7d992c`
-- · C.3 — Refresh metrics report from full 988-entity set  `84a59244`
-- · C.4 — Document advanced usage patterns  `0ef75ee5`
-- · C.5 — Add composition guide referencing supply-chain-vsm  `864977db`
-- · C.6 — Write performance notes  `414496b0`
-- · C.7 — S3.2: Complete clean per-chapter git history  `21c865c1`
-- … and 1 more open tasks
 
 ---
 ## MCP Orientation (when available)
 
 If the state-hub MCP server is reachable, call:
-`get_domain_summary("markitect")`
+`get_domain_summary("communication")`
 This provides richer cross-domain context.
 If the MCP call fails, use this file as your orientation source.

.gitignore

@@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ debug_*.py
 
 # Claude Code local settings (user-specific permissions)
 .claude/settings.local.json
+# Claude Code runtime session locks (per-session, not content)
+.claude/*.lock
 
 .aider*
 

.repo-classification.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+repo_classification:
+  standard: Repo Classification Standard
+  version: '1.0'
+  classified_at: '2026-06-22'
+  classified_by: human
+  category: product
+  domain: communication
+  secondary_domains:
+  - infotech
+  - agents
+  capability_tags:
+  - knowledge
+  - documentation
+  - product-development
+  - platform
+  business_stake:
+  - product
+  - technology
+  - execution
+  business_mechanics:
+  - intention
+  - coordination
+  - operation
+  - adaptation
+  notes: Markitect successor to archived markitect-project; human confirmed.

AGENTS.md

@@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
+# Markitect Main — Agent Instructions
+
+## Repo Identity
+
+**Purpose:** Markitect Main - (fill in purpose)
+
+**Domain:** communication
+**Repo slug:** markitect-main
+**Topic ID:** `36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc`
+**Workplan prefix:** `MARKITECT-WP-`
+
+---
+
+## State Hub Integration
+
+The Custodian State Hub tracks work across all domains. Interact via HTTP REST —
+there is no MCP server for Codex agents.
+
+| Context | URL |
+|---------|-----|
+| Local workstation | `http://127.0.0.1:8000` |
+| Remote via tunnel | `http://127.0.0.1:18000` |
+
+### Orient at session start
+
+```bash
+# Offline brief — works without hub connection
+cat .custodian-brief.md
+
+# Active workstreams for this domain
+curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8000/workstreams/?topic_id=36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc&status=active" \
+  | python3 -m json.tool
+
+# Check inbox
+curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8000/messages/?to_agent=markitect-main&unread_only=true" \
+  | python3 -m json.tool
+```
+
+Mark a message read:
+```bash
+curl -s -X PATCH "http://127.0.0.1:8000/messages/<id>/read" \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{}'
+```
+
+### Log progress (required at session close)
+
+```bash
+curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8000/progress/ \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
+  -d '{
+    "summary": "what was done",
+    "event_type": "note",
+    "author": "codex",
+    "workstream_id": "<uuid>",
+    "task_id": "<uuid>"
+  }'
+```
+
+Omit `workstream_id` / `task_id` when not applicable.
+
+### Update task status
+
+```bash
+curl -s -X PATCH "http://127.0.0.1:8000/tasks/<task_id>" \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
+  -d '{"status": "progress"}'
+# values: wait | todo | progress | done | cancel
+```
+
+### Flag a task for human review
+
+```bash
+curl -s -X PATCH "http://127.0.0.1:8000/tasks/<task_id>" \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
+  -d '{"needs_human": true, "intervention_note": "reason"}'
+```
+
+---
+
+## Session Protocol
+
+**Start:**
+1. `cat .custodian-brief.md` — domain goal and open workstreams (offline-safe)
+2. Check inbox: `GET /messages/?to_agent=markitect-main&unread_only=true`; mark read
+3. Scan workplans: `ls workplans/` — note `status: ready`, `active`, or `blocked` files and open tasks
+4. Check human-needed tasks: `GET /tasks/?needs_human=true`
+
+**During work:**
+- Update task statuses in workplan files as tasks progress
+- Record significant decisions via `POST /decisions/`
+
+**Close:**
+1. Update workplan file task statuses to reflect progress
+2. Log: `POST /progress/` with a summary of what changed
+3. Note for the custodian operator: after workplan file changes, run from
+   `~/state-hub`:
+   ```bash
+   make fix-consistency REPO=markitect-main
+   ```
+   This syncs task status from files into the hub DB.
+
+---
+
+## Credential and access routing
+
+**Audience:** Codex, Claude Code, Grok, and custodian agents that call **llm-connect**
+for inference. Run this check **before** requesting secrets, API keys, SSH access,
+login tokens, or database passwords — in any repo, not only `ops-warden`.
+
+ops-warden **issues SSH certificates only** (`warden sign`, `cert_command`). Every
+other credential need belongs to another subsystem. **Do not** message
+`ops-warden` on State Hub expecting a secret value; the reply is a pointer, not a key.
+
+### Lookup (do this first)
+
+```bash
+warden route find "<describe your need>" --json
+warden route show <catalog-id> --json
+```
+
+Requires the `warden` CLI from `~/ops-warden` (`uv tool install .` or `uv run warden`).
+
+| Agent runtime | How to orient |
+| --- | --- |
+| **Codex / Grok** (shell, HTTP State Hub) | `warden route` commands above; inbox `to_agent=markitect-main` is for coordination, not secret vending |
+| **Claude Code** (MCP when available) | `get_domain_summary("custodian")` for workstreams; **still** use `warden route` for credential ownership |
+| **llm-connect** (inference service) | Never put secret retrieval in prompts; route custody to OpenBao/operator paths surfaced by `warden route` |
+
+### Quick routing table
+
+| I need… | Owner | ops-warden executes? |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| SSH cert (`adm`/`agt`/`atm`) | ops-warden | **Yes** — `warden sign` |
+| API key, DB password, provider token | OpenBao (`railiance-platform`) | No — route only |
+| Login / OIDC / MFA | key-cape / Keycloak | No — route only |
+| Authorization decision | flex-auth | No — route only |
+| activity-core → issue-core emission | activity-core + issue-core | No — `warden route show activity-core-issue-sink` |
+| SSH tunnel | ops-bridge (+ `cert_command` from warden) | No — route only |
+
+### Anti-patterns (do not do these)
+
+- `POST /messages/` to `ops-warden` asking for `ISSUE_CORE_API_KEY`, `OPENROUTER_API_KEY`, etc.
+- Inventing `warden secret`, `warden login`, `warden bao`, `warden tunnel` — they do not exist
+- Pasting secrets into Git, State Hub, workplans, logs, or chat
+
+### Other capabilities (reuse-surface)
+
+Non-credential capabilities are usually discovered through **reuse-surface** federation
+(`reuse-surface` registry / `capability.*` indexes). Credential routing is inlined in
+every repo's agent instructions because it is high-frequency, high-risk, and easy to
+get wrong.
+
+**Canon:** `~/ops-warden/wiki/CredentialRouting.md` · catalog `~/ops-warden/registry/routing/catalog.yaml`
+
+<!-- REPO-AGENTS-EXTENSIONS -->
+<!-- Append repo-specific agent instructions below this marker.
+     The state-hub template sync preserves content after this line. -->
+
+---
+
+## Workplan Convention (ADR-001)
+
+Work items originate as files in this repo — not in the hub. The hub is a
+read/cache/index layer that rebuilds from files.
+
+**File location:** `workplans/MARKITECT-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`
+
+**Archived location:** finished workplans may move to
+`workplans/archived/YYMMDD-MARKITECT-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`. The `YYMMDD` prefix is
+the completion/archive date; the frontmatter `id` does not change.
+
+**Ad Hoc Tasks:** small opportunistic fixes discovered during a session use
+`workplans/ADHOC-YYYY-MM-DD.md` with task ids `ADHOC-YYYY-MM-DD-T01`, etc. Use
+this only for low-risk work completed directly; create a normal workplan for
+anything needing analysis, design, approval, dependencies, or multiple phases.
+
+**Frontmatter:**
+
+```yaml
+---
+id: MARKITECT-WP-NNNN
+type: workplan
+title: "..."
+domain: communication
+repo: markitect-main
+status: proposed | ready | active | blocked | backlog | finished | archived
+owner: codex
+topic_slug: ...
+created: "YYYY-MM-DD"
+updated: "YYYY-MM-DD"
+state_hub_workstream_id: "<uuid>"   # written by fix-consistency — do not edit
+---
+```
+
+Use `proposed` for a new draft, `ready` after review against current repo
+state, and `finished` after implementation. `stalled` and `needs_review` are
+derived health labels, not frontmatter statuses.
+
+**Task block format** (one per `##` section):
+
+```
+## Task Title
+
+` ` `task
+id: MARKITECT-WP-NNNN-T01
+status: wait | todo | progress | done | cancel
+priority: high | medium | low
+state_hub_task_id: "<uuid>"         # written by fix-consistency — do not edit
+` ` `
+
+Task description text.
+```
+
+Status progression: `todo` → `progress` → `done`; use `wait` for waiting/blocked work and `cancel` for stopped work.
+
+To create a new workplan:
+1. Write the file following the format above
+2. Notify the custodian operator to run `make fix-consistency REPO=markitect-main`
+   (or send a message to the hub agent via `POST /messages/`)

CLAUDE.md

@@ -1,120 +1,12 @@
-# CLAUDE.md
+# Markitect Main — Claude Code Instructions
 
-This file provides guidance to Claude Code (claude.ai/code) when working with code in this repository.
+@SCOPE.md
-
+@.claude/rules/repo-identity.md
-## Custodian State Hub Integration
+@.claude/rules/session-protocol.md
-
+@.claude/rules/first-session.md
-This project is tracked as the **markitect** domain in the Custodian State Hub.
+@.claude/rules/workplan-convention.md
-Hub topic ID: `5571d954-0d30-4950-980d-7bcaaad8e3e2`
+@.claude/rules/stack-and-commands.md
-
+@.claude/rules/architecture.md
-**Session start:** Call `get_domain_summary("markitect")` via the `state-hub` MCP tool.
+@.claude/rules/repo-boundary.md
-If the hub is not reachable: `cd ~/the-custodian/state-hub && make api`
+@.claude/rules/credential-routing.md
-
+@.claude/rules/agents.md
-**Session end:** Call `add_progress_event()` with `topic_id` above, a `summary`, and `event_type` (`note` / `milestone` / `blocker`).
-
-**Available state-hub MCP tools:** `get_state_summary`, `get_domain_summary`, `add_progress_event`, `create_workstream`, `create_task`, `update_task_status`, `record_decision`, `resolve_decision`.
-
-If the hub API is unavailable, use `curl` against `http://127.0.0.1:8000/docs`.
-
----
-
-## Development Commands
-
-All commands assume the `markitect-venv` virtual environment is active (`source ~/.venvs/markitect-venv/bin/activate` or equivalent). The package is installed in editable mode.
-
-```bash
-# Run the core test suite
-pytest
-
-# Run a single test file
-pytest tests/test_issue_17_batch_processing.py
-
-# Run tests by marker
-pytest -m unit
-pytest -m "not slow"
-
-# Run with coverage
-pytest --cov=markitect
-
-# Run only fast unit tests (TDD inner loop)
-pytest tests/unit/
-
-# CLI entry point
-markitect --help
-
-# Infospace subcommands (primary active development area)
-markitect infospace --help
-markitect infospace eval-summary --update-metrics
-
-# LLM helper commands
-markitect llm-helper "<question>"
-markitect llm-catalog
-markitect llm-check
-markitect llm-default
-markitect llm-preference
-
-# Install / reinstall in dev mode
-pip install -e ".[analysis]"
-```
-
-## Architecture
-
-MarkiTect is a CLI-driven markdown engine that treats documents as structured, queryable information spaces. Entry point: `markitect/cli.py` → `main()` (Click group). All subcommand groups are registered at the bottom of `cli.py`.
-
-### Core Modules (`markitect/`)
-
-| Module | Purpose |
-|--------|---------|
-| `spaces/` | InformationSpace model — composability, events, history, transclusion, rendering, sync |
-| `prompts/` | Prompt resolver, compiler, execution engine, quality gates, dependency graph, traceability |
-| `llm/` | LLM adapter layer — 4 text providers + embedding adapter; 7-layer config resolution |
-| `infospace/` | Infospace lifecycle — init, entity parsing, evaluation, composition, graph export |
-| `analysis/` | Graph analysis (networkx) and FCA (Formal Concept Analysis, pure Python) |
-| `schema*/` | Schema generation, validation, naming, refinement, metaschema |
-| `core/` | Foundational parser, AST, serializer, workspace |
-
-### LLM Configuration (`markitect/llm/`)
-
-Resolution order (highest → lowest priority):
-1. CLI flags (`--provider`, `--model`)
-2. `MARKITECT_HELPER_MODEL` env var (model only)
-3. User preference (`[llm.preference]` in `~/.config/markitect/config.toml`)
-4. Directory preference (`[llm.preference]` in `.markitect.toml`)
-5. Directory default (`[llm.default]` in `.markitect.toml`)
-6. User default (`[llm.default]` in `~/.config/markitect/config.toml`)
-7. Hardcoded fallback: `gemini/gemini-2.5-flash`
-
-Canonical models: `markitect/llm/models.py` (`RunConfig`, `LLMResponse`) and `markitect/llm/adapter.py` (`LLMAdapter`). These are mirrored in the standalone `/home/worsch/llm-connect/` package (`llm_connect`), which is installed as a local path dependency. `markitect/prompts/execution/{models,llm_adapter}.py` are re-export shims for backward compatibility.
-
-**Gotcha:** The `OPENROUTER_API_KEY` env var may hold a stale key — `unset OPENROUTER_API_KEY` before running LLM commands if you get auth errors. `claude-code` provider fails inside Claude Code sessions (nested session restriction).
-
-### Infospace (`markitect/infospace/`)
-
-An infospace is a directory-based collection of typed entities governed by an `infospace.yaml` config. Key files:
-- `config.py` — config loading, `find_infospace_config()`, `DisciplineBinding`
-- `entity_parser.py` — parse entity markdown files from `output/entities/<slug>.md`
-- `evaluation.py` / `evaluation_io.py` — per-entity LLM evaluation (5 dimensions)
-- `state.py` — `build_state()` aggregates entity + evaluation state
-- `history.py` / `checks/` — viability tracking and collection-level checks
-
-Slugs use **underscores** (e.g., `accumulation_of_stock`). Active example: `examples/infospace-with-history/` (988 entities).
-
-### Layered Architecture
-
-The project has a partially-implemented layered architecture separate from `markitect/`:
-- `domain/` — domain models (issues, projects)
-- `infrastructure/` — config, repositories, logging, connection management
-- `application/` — application layer (mostly empty)
-- `capabilities/` — pluggable capability packages (`issue-facade`, `release-management`, `testdrive-jsui`, `markitect-utils`, `markitect-content`, `kaizen-agentic`)
-
-### Tests
-
-Tests live in `tests/`. Many test files are named `test_issue_NNN_*.py` (TDD by issue). Layered tests follow `test_l{N}_*.py` naming. The `tests/unit/` subtree has the cleanest structure and covers `prompts/`, `spaces/`, `llm/`, `infospace/`, `analysis/`.
-
-Pytest config is in `pytest.ini`. Relevant markers: `unit`, `integration`, `e2e`, `slow`, `performance`.
-
-### Active Roadmap Files
-
-- `roadmap/infospace-tooling/PLAN.md` — main infospace roadmap (S1 ✅ S2 ✅ S3 nearly done)
-- `roadmap/infospace-s3-closeout/PLAN.md` — S3 close-out tasks (C.1–C.8)
-- `roadmap/llm-shared-library/PLAN.md` — llm-connect extraction (S1+S2 done, S3 pending)

SCOPE.md

@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ MarkiTect turns fragmented knowledge (scattered docs, chats, notes) into structu
 
 ---
 
-## Related / Overlapping Repositories
+## Related / Overlapping
 
 - `llm-connect` — standalone LLM adapter extracted from MarkiTect (dependency)
 - `the-custodian` — tracks markitect workstreams; custodian canon includes a markitect domain charter

docs/successor-gap-assessment.md

@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+# markitect-main → Successor Repos: Gap Assessment
+
+**Date:** 2026-05-23
+**Author:** Claude (custodian session)
+**Status:** Draft — awaiting Bernd's decisions on items A/B/C below
+
+## Purpose
+
+Bernd is retiring `markitect-main` and has transferred most functionality to
+sibling repos. This document identifies what was provided by `markitect-main`
+that is **not addressed** in those successors, and flags candidates that may
+not fit any successor's intent.
+
+## Successor Ecosystem (5 repos, not 3)
+
+| Repo | Role |
+|---|---|
+| `markitect-tool` | Markdown syntax layer + structured-document primitives; defines source-adapter and render-adapter contracts. CLI: `mkt`. |
+| `kontextual-engine` | Headless knowledge operations engine: artifacts, collections, persistence, relationships, workflow runs/manifests, query, quality/assessment, API. |
+| `infospace-bench` | Application layer — concrete infospaces, evaluation methodology, reference pilots. |
+| `markitect-filter` | Source-format ingestion adapters (`source.epub3`, `source.pdf`) implementing the markitect-tool source-adapter contract. |
+| `markitect-quarkdown` | Render/export adapter — implements the markitect-tool render-adapter contract via Quarkdown. |
+
+## Method
+
+Analysis is grounded in each successor's own assessment docs (recent, May 2026):
+
+- `markitect-tool/docs/markitect-main-scope-assessment.md`
+- `kontextual-engine/docs/markitect-main-scope-assessment.md`
+- `kontextual-engine/docs/system-layer-extraction-inventory.md`
+- `kontextual-engine/docs/system-layer-migration-backlog.md`
+- `infospace-bench/docs/markitect-main-scope-assessment.md`
+- `infospace-bench/docs/legacy-infospace-feature-inventory.md`
+- `infospace-bench/docs/replacement-acceptance-matrix.md`
+
+Cross-checked against actual `markitect-main` module sizing (Python LOC) and
+`__init__.py` docstrings.
+
+**Confidence:** These successor docs are authoritative on *intent*. They have
+**not** been line-verified to confirm every "reimplement"-classified item
+actually landed in the successor. Where verification matters, it's flagged.
+
+---
+
+## A. Doesn't fit any successor's intent — needs a new home or explicit retirement
+
+These are explicitly pushed away by tool/engine/bench and are unrelated to
+filter/quarkdown.
+
+| markitect-main area | LOC | What it is | Status |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| `markitect/finance/` | ~8,100 | Cost-tracking system: cost items, period allocation to issues, financial reports, audit trails | **Orphan.** markitect-main's own SCOPE.md lists "financial transactions" as out-of-scope. Belongs with issue/project-ops, not knowledge tooling. |
+| `issue_tracker/` + `_issue-tracking/` + `.issues/` | ~1,200 | Issue tracking (finance allocates costs to these issues) | **Orphan to the five** — but likely already superseded by the `issue-facade` capability / `use-issues` skill. **Verify before retiring.** |
+| `markitect/profile/` | ~1,600 | User-profile CRUD, multi-profile, DB-backed | **Orphan.** Unrelated to all five. (Distinct from quarkdown's *render* "profile".) |
+| `markitect/production/` | ~3,800 | Deployment-readiness validation, cross-platform checks, perf benchmarking | Engine keeps only "structured error/audit *ideas*". Deployment-validation bulk is orphan. |
+| `tools/`, `services/`, gitea/tddai glue | ~5,500 | Project-ops tooling | Out-of-scope everywhere. |
+| `markitect/legacy/` + `legacy_compat.py` | ~2,700 | Backward-compat shims | Retire by definition. |
+
+## B. Rendering / asset / plugin layer — only *partially* covered, real residual gap
+
+**This is the most consequential gap.** `SCOPE.md` lists "Rendering: markdown
+→ interactive HTML via plugin system (testdrive-jsui)" as an in-scope
+capability of markitect-main.
+
+| Area | LOC | Covered? |
+|---|---|---|
+| `markitect/plugins/` (generic processor/formatter/validator/exporter plugin system) | ~8,000 | **No.** tool defines a render-adapter *contract* and an *extension* point, but the general plugin runtime isn't carried. |
+| `markitect/assets/` (content-addressable asset store, dedup, `.mdpkg` ZIP packaging, symlink handling) + `asset_registry.json` (277 KB) | ~6,000 | **No.** Bench says "leave behind unless a concrete export needs assets." |
+| Interactive-HTML / testdrive-jsui rendering, `static/`, `themes/`, `templates/document.html`, JS UI | — | **Partial only.** quarkdown covers a *Quarkdown* export path; the interactive-HTML / JS-UI path has no home. |
+
+**Decision needed:** spin these into a dedicated render/asset repo (sibling to
+quarkdown), fold the asset store into one of the existing repos, or retire the
+interactive-HTML path.
+
+## C. The other "Information Space" lineage — `markitect/spaces/` (~11,000 LOC)
+
+**Distinct from `markitect/infospace/`** (which infospace-bench inherited).
+`spaces/` is an older/parallel abstraction with features bench did *not* take:
+
+- event-driven change tracking & notifications
+- persistent transclusion context with cross-space references
+- bidirectional directory synchronization
+- HTML rendering of spaces with caching/themes
+
+Engine takes generic persistence concepts and bench takes infospace semantics,
+but **these specific `spaces/` behaviors (bidirectional sync, event
+notifications, cross-space transclusion context) aren't mapped anywhere.**
+
+Likely intended as dead/superseded — but 11k LOC warrants an explicit "retire
+vs salvage" call.
+
+## D. Declined-by-design (confirm retirement, don't re-extract)
+
+| Area | LOC | Disposition |
+|---|---|---|
+| `markitect/graphql/` | ~4,000 | All three explicitly declined GraphQL ("evidence of API need, not a commitment"). |
+| `markitect/query_paradigms/` | ~3,500 | Engine/tool keep the *QueryResult envelope* concept but say "do not port the registry wholesale." |
+| `markitect/proxy/` | ~870 | Non-markdown→md proxy with checksum/freshness tracking. **Overlaps markitect-filter.** Freshness/staleness-tracking mechanism may be worth checking against bench's deferred "stale-mappings." |
+| `capabilities/` (top-level) | ~8,300 | Capability-packaging architecture; partially maps to tool (schema generation) but the packaging approach itself isn't carried. |
+
+---
+
+## What this means
+
+The successors are, by their own assessments, **near complete for the
+in-scope core** (parsing/schema → tool; persistence/workflow → engine;
+infospace lifecycle → bench; ingestion → filter; one render path →
+quarkdown). The truly unaddressed functionality is almost entirely the stuff
+markitect-main accreted **beyond** its stated scope: finance, issue tracking,
+user profiles, production/deployment validation, the asset/plugin/interactive-HTML
+rendering stack, and the older `spaces/` abstraction.
+
+## Decisions for Bernd
+
+Three live decisions, not a long extraction backlog:
+
+### Decision 1 — Render/asset stack (Section B)
+The one with genuine product value left.
+- **Option 1a:** new repo (sibling to quarkdown) for plugin runtime + asset store + interactive-HTML
+- **Option 1b:** fold the asset store into an existing repo (most likely markitect-tool, behind a flag); retire interactive-HTML
+- **Option 1c:** retire the interactive-HTML path entirely; trust quarkdown export as the single render story
+
+### Decision 2 — `markitect/spaces/` (Section C)
+- **Option 2a:** salvage bidirectional-sync / event-tracking / cross-space transclusion into engine (engine has the persistence story to support it)
+- **Option 2b:** retire wholesale as superseded by infospace
+
+### Decision 3 — Project-ops cluster (Section A: finance + issues + profile)
+- **Option 3a:** confirm `issue-facade` already replaces `issue_tracker/` + `finance/`; retire both
+- **Option 3b:** identify a home for any pieces worth keeping
+
+---
+
+## Suggested verification before deciding
+
+If verification matters before committing:
+
+- **For Decision 1:** grep the five repos for any render/asset adapter that already covers the HTML path beyond Quarkdown.
+- **For Decision 2:** check whether engine's `OperationRun` + collection model can express bidirectional-sync semantics, or whether new primitives would be needed.
+- **For Decision 3:** confirm whether `issue-facade` truly replaces `issue_tracker/` + `finance/` end-to-end.
+
+Happy to do any of these focused passes when you're ready to decide.

registry/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+# Capability Registry
+
+Markdown-first capability index for federation and reuse planning.
+
+## Authoring
+
+1. Copy a capability entry template (see reuse-surface `templates/capability-entry.template.md`).
+2. Add the row to `indexes/capabilities.yaml`.
+3. Run `reuse-surface validate` from a checkout with the CLI installed.
+4. Merge to `main` and verify publish with `reuse-surface establish --publish-check`.
+
+Federation contract: reuse-surface `docs/RegistryFederation.md`.

registry/indexes/capabilities.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+version: 1
+updated: '2026-06-16'
+domain: helix_forge
+capabilities: []

workplans/MARKITECT-WP-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+---
+id: MARKITECT-WP-0001
+type: workplan
+title: "Bootstrap State Hub integration"
+domain: communication
+repo: markitect-main
+status: finished
+owner: codex
+topic_slug: communication
+created: "2026-06-22"
+updated: "2026-06-22"
+state_hub_workstream_id: "dfc40b03-fe8e-49fe-b8d4-86eb1fe26b4a"
+---
+
+# Bootstrap State Hub integration
+
+Knowledge artifact management and markdown engine platform.
+
+## Review Generated Integration Files
+
+```task
+id: MARKITECT-WP-0001-T01
+status: done
+priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "7455a381-a93d-4220-8f80-3b6ccf953cff"
+
+```
+
+Result 2026-06-22: SCOPE.md and INTRODUCTION.md reviewed; AGENTS.md confirmed.
+
+Review `INTENT.md`, `SCOPE.md`, `AGENTS.md`, and `.custodian-brief.md`.
+Replace generated placeholders with repo-specific facts where needed.
+
+## Verify Local Developer Workflow
+
+```task
+id: MARKITECT-WP-0001-T02
+status: done
+priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "7e34bdab-aa49-49ca-b28a-b254725dd8db"
+
+```
+
+Result 2026-06-22: Documented make-based Python/JS workflow.
+
+Identify the repo's install, test, lint, build, and run commands. Add or refine
+those commands in the agent instructions so future coding sessions can verify
+changes confidently.
+
+## Seed First Real Workplan
+
+```task
+id: MARKITECT-WP-0001-T03
+status: done
+priority: medium
+state_hub_task_id: "35a64da7-dda9-4315-901d-88c6827432d9"
+
+```
+
+Result 2026-06-22: MARKITECT-WP-0002 already exists (TestDrive npm publication).
+
+Create the first implementation workplan for the repository's most important
+next change. After workplan file updates, run from `~/state-hub`:
+
+```bash
+make fix-consistency REPO=markitect-main
+```

workplans/MARKITECT-WP-0002-testdrive-jsui-publication.md

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+---
+id: MARKITECT-WP-0002
+type: workplan
+title: "TestDrive-JSUI — npm Publication"
+domain: communication
+repo: markitect-main
+status: backlog
+owner: codex
+topic_slug: communication
+created: "2026-06-22"
+updated: "2026-06-22"
+state_hub_workstream_id: "e203d487-01f1-494a-b14d-a436241a4c01"
+---
+
+# TestDrive-JSUI — npm Publication
+
+Backlog workstream for publishing the TestDrive JSUI package to npm.
+
+## Publication Readiness
+
+```task
+id: MARKITECT-WP-0002-T01
+status: todo
+priority: medium
+state_hub_task_id: "88b3c206-4d45-4bb3-bbb3-47443cdf2123"
+```
+
+Define package scope, versioning, and publication checklist for TestDrive-JSUI.