# WoN Mapping Rules — Supply Chain Infospace ## Purpose of Mapping The mapping stage asks: which Wealth of Nations concept does this supply chain entity most directly correspond to? The goal is not to find a superficial name match but to identify structural correspondence — same mechanism, same trade-off, same systemic role — even when the surface form is entirely different. Smith had no concept of just-in-time inventory or logistics platforms. But he had detailed accounts of circulating capital, merchant intermediaries, and market price oscillation. The mapping discipline asks whether modern concepts are genuinely new structures or modern instantiations of mechanisms Smith already described. ## Mapping Strength Calibration **Strong**: The modern concept and the WoN concept are the same mechanism in different historical settings. The supply chain entity could be used as an example in a modern edition of Smith's chapter, with only contextual updating needed. Example: Vendor-Managed Inventory is a Strong map to Division of Labour — the function of inventory management is delegated to the party with the greatest competence and information, which is precisely Smith's argument for specialisation. **Moderate**: The concepts share structural logic but differ in important ways — the modern concept has features Smith's lacks, or operates under conditions Smith did not analyse. The WoN concept illuminates the modern concept but does not fully characterise it. Example: Bullwhip Effect is a Moderate map to Natural Price as Central Price — both describe oscillation of a market signal around a theoretical equilibrium, but the bullwhip's amplification mechanism is an information distortion Smith did not analyse in this form. **Weak**: The mapping is analogical — useful for analysis but the correspondence is partial or strained. The WoN concept provides a useful frame but should not be treated as explanatory of the modern concept. ## One-to-Many Mappings A supply chain entity may map to more than one WoN concept. Where this occurs, create a separate mapping entry for each WoN concept, explaining the different facets each illuminates. ## Unmappable Entities If no plausible WoN mapping exists (the concept is genuinely novel), document this explicitly with a brief explanation of what Smith's framework lacks that would be needed to capture the concept. ## VSM Inheritance Every WoN entity in the reference set has a VSM system assignment. When a supply chain entity maps to a WoN entity, it inherits that VSM position. If the supply chain entity maps to multiple WoN entities with different VSM assignments, note the primary inheritance and explain any secondary VSM roles.