# Supply Chain Entity Schema v1.0

Every extracted entity must contain the following sections in this order.

## Required Sections

### H1 Heading

The entity name in title case. Should be a noun phrase identifying a
distinct concept, mechanism, or structure in supply chain management.

Example: `# Bullwhip Effect`

### Definition

20–150 words. Precise, non-circular definition of the concept. Must
identify what it is, not just what it does. Avoid defining a term
using the term itself.

### Source

The source document this entity was extracted from, citing section
if available. Format: `[Source Name], [Section]`

### Supply Chain Domain

One of: **Coordination**, **Capital Management**, **Market Structure**,
**Risk**, **Logistics**

### VSM Assignment

One of: S1, S2, S3, S3*, S4, S5 — which layer of the Viable System Model
this entity primarily inhabits. Brief rationale (one sentence).

### WoN Concept

The Wealth of Nations concept this entity most directly corresponds to.
State the WoN entity name and a one-sentence explanation of the connection.
If no direct correspondence exists, state "No direct WoN analogue" and
explain why.

## Optional Sections

### Modern Context

Additional notes on how the concept has evolved since Smith's time, or
how it differs from its classical form.

## Quality Metrics

Evaluation rubric for per-entity LLM assessment:

- **Definition Precision** (1–5): Is the definition specific, non-circular,
  and distinguishable from adjacent concepts?
- **Source Grounding** (1–5): Is the entity grounded in the source material?
- **Domain Placement** (1–5): Is the supply chain domain assignment correct?
- **WoN Relevance** (1–5): Is the WoN mapping substantive and well-reasoned?
- **Explanatory Value** (1–5): Does this entity contribute to understanding
  modern supply chains through the WoN lens?