# WoN Mapping Schema v1.0

Every mapping from a supply chain entity to a Wealth of Nations concept
must contain the following sections.

## Required Sections

### H1 Heading

Format: `Supply Chain Entity → WoN Entity`

Example: `# Bullwhip Effect → Natural Price as Central Price`

### Supply Chain Entity

The supply chain entity being mapped (title case name).

### WoN Entity

The Wealth of Nations entity being mapped to. Must be an entity that
exists in the WoN infospace (see `artifacts/won-reference/core-entities.md`
for the curated reference set).

### Mapping Rationale

Minimum 40 words. Explain why this supply chain concept corresponds to
this WoN concept. Ground the mapping in both the supply chain definition
and Smith's original analysis. Do not rely on surface-level name similarity.

### Conceptual Continuity

One of: **Strong**, **Moderate**, **Weak**

- **Strong**: The modern concept directly instantiates the WoN concept —
  same mechanism, different technology or scale
- **Moderate**: The modern concept resembles the WoN concept in structure
  but differs in important ways
- **Weak**: The mapping is analogical — useful for analysis but not a
  direct correspondence

### VSM Inheritance

Because the WoN entity is already mapped to a VSM system in the WoN
infospace, the supply chain entity inherits a VSM position by transitivity.
State: `[Supply Chain Entity] inherits [VSM System] via [WoN Entity]`

## Quality Metrics

- **Rationale Rigour** (1–5): Is the mapping justified by substantive
  analysis, not just surface similarity?
- **Continuity Calibration** (1–5): Is the declared strength consistent
  with the rationale?
- **VSM Coherence** (1–5): Does the inherited VSM assignment make sense
  for the supply chain entity?