Files
markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/bank_economic_contribution.md
tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.8 KiB

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores
entity_slug evaluator evaluated_at overall_score scores
bank_economic_contribution null 2026-02-23T00:38:25.785555 2.6
name value max_value rationale
definition_precision 2.0 5.0 The definition is overly broad and umbrella-like, essentially describing "all the ways banks help the economy" rather than capturing a distinct, bounded concept. It lacks precision by lumping together disparate mechanisms (capital allocation, transaction facilitation, risk management) under a vague "overall impact" framing.
name value max_value rationale
source_grounding 3.0 5.0 While Smith does discuss banking's economic benefits in Book II, Chapter 2, this entity appears to be a modern analytical construct that aggregates his observations rather than reflecting a specific concept he articulated. Smith examines particular banking functions and their effects, but doesn't present a unified theory of "bank economic contribution" as such.
name value max_value rationale
domain_placement 4.0 5.0 The "Accumulation" domain placement is appropriate since Smith's discussion of banking in Book II, Chapter 2 focuses on how banks facilitate capital formation and productive investment. Banking's role in channeling savings into productive uses aligns well with the accumulation theme.
name value max_value rationale
vsm_relevance 2.0 5.0 This entity is too abstract and aggregated to map meaningfully to specific VSM systems, as it encompasses functions that would span multiple systems (S1 operations, S2 coordination, S4 intelligence). The broad "overall impact" framing makes it VSM-neutral rather than illuminating particular systemic functions.
name value max_value rationale
explanatory_value 2.0 5.0 This entity provides little explanatory power beyond naming the general fact that banks contribute to economic development. It doesn't illuminate specific mechanisms or structural relations that would help understand how banking actually works within Smith's economic framework.

Evaluation: Bank Economic Contribution

definition_precision — 2.0 / 5.0

The definition is overly broad and umbrella-like, essentially describing "all the ways banks help the economy" rather than capturing a distinct, bounded concept. It lacks precision by lumping together disparate mechanisms (capital allocation, transaction facilitation, risk management) under a vague "overall impact" framing.

source_grounding — 3.0 / 5.0

While Smith does discuss banking's economic benefits in Book II, Chapter 2, this entity appears to be a modern analytical construct that aggregates his observations rather than reflecting a specific concept he articulated. Smith examines particular banking functions and their effects, but doesn't present a unified theory of "bank economic contribution" as such.

domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0

The "Accumulation" domain placement is appropriate since Smith's discussion of banking in Book II, Chapter 2 focuses on how banks facilitate capital formation and productive investment. Banking's role in channeling savings into productive uses aligns well with the accumulation theme.

vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0

This entity is too abstract and aggregated to map meaningfully to specific VSM systems, as it encompasses functions that would span multiple systems (S1 operations, S2 coordination, S4 intelligence). The broad "overall impact" framing makes it VSM-neutral rather than illuminating particular systemic functions.

explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0

This entity provides little explanatory power beyond naming the general fact that banks contribute to economic development. It doesn't illuminate specific mechanisms or structural relations that would help understand how banking actually works within Smith's economic framework.