Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.7 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

capital_employment_effects

null

2026-02-23T04:40:45.812680

4.4

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly distinguishes between different types of capital employment and their specific effects on labor utilization and value creation. It avoids circularity and identifies measurable outcomes (quantity of productive labour, value added) that differentiate the concept.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This entity is directly grounded in Book II, Chapter 5, where Smith explicitly analyzes and ranks different capital employments by their productivity effects. The hierarchical ranking (agriculture > manufacturing > trade) and the focus on labor utilization are central themes Smith develops systematically in this chapter.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement as this concept represents one of Smith's fundamental theoretical frameworks for understanding capital allocation efficiency. It's a core analytical tool that spans multiple economic sectors rather than belonging to any specific industry domain.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	3.0	5.0	This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it provides analytical framework for understanding how different capital deployments affect system performance. However, it's somewhat abstract and doesn't clearly align with operational systems (S1-S3) or pure policy (S5).

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	5.0	5.0	This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating the structural mechanism behind Smith's policy preferences and his theory of optimal resource allocation. It explains why Smith advocates for certain economic policies and reveals the underlying logic of his productivity analysis.

Evaluation: Capital Employment Effects

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes between different types of capital employment and their specific effects on labor utilization and value creation. It avoids circularity and identifies measurable outcomes (quantity of productive labour, value added) that differentiate the concept.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is directly grounded in Book II, Chapter 5, where Smith explicitly analyzes and ranks different capital employments by their productivity effects. The hierarchical ranking (agriculture > manufacturing > trade) and the focus on labor utilization are central themes Smith develops systematically in this chapter.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is the appropriate domain placement as this concept represents one of Smith's fundamental theoretical frameworks for understanding capital allocation efficiency. It's a core analytical tool that spans multiple economic sectors rather than belonging to any specific industry domain.

vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it provides analytical framework for understanding how different capital deployments affect system performance. However, it's somewhat abstract and doesn't clearly align with operational systems (S1-S3) or pure policy (S5).

explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating the structural mechanism behind Smith's policy preferences and his theory of optimal resource allocation. It explains why Smith advocates for certain economic policies and reveals the underlying logic of his productivity analysis.

3.7 KiB Raw Blame History