Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.5 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

colony_economic_development_constraints

null

2026-02-23T04:52:34.337077

4.4

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly identifies specific types of constraints (trade restrictions, lack of representation, defense costs) rather than being vaguely circular. It captures a distinct concept about artificial barriers to colonial economic development.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This entity is well-grounded in Book V, Chapter 3, where Smith extensively discusses how mother countries impose various restrictions and costs on colonies that hinder their natural economic development. The specific constraints mentioned align directly with Smith's analysis.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	The "Regulation" domain is perfectly appropriate since these constraints represent regulatory and policy interventions by mother countries that distort natural economic processes. This is fundamentally about regulatory frameworks rather than market mechanisms or production.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) from the mother country's perspective, representing regulatory control mechanisms over colonial operations. It could also relate to S4 (intelligence/adaptation) as constraints that prevent colonies from adapting to their local environments.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	The entity provides genuine explanatory power by identifying the structural mechanisms through which mother countries limit colonial development, helping explain why colonies underperform their economic potential. It illuminates the causal relationship between imperial control and economic inefficiency.

Evaluation: Colony Economic Development Constraints

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly identifies specific types of constraints (trade restrictions, lack of representation, defense costs) rather than being vaguely circular. It captures a distinct concept about artificial barriers to colonial economic development.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is well-grounded in Book V, Chapter 3, where Smith extensively discusses how mother countries impose various restrictions and costs on colonies that hinder their natural economic development. The specific constraints mentioned align directly with Smith's analysis.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Regulation" domain is perfectly appropriate since these constraints represent regulatory and policy interventions by mother countries that distort natural economic processes. This is fundamentally about regulatory frameworks rather than market mechanisms or production.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) from the mother country's perspective, representing regulatory control mechanisms over colonial operations. It could also relate to S4 (intelligence/adaptation) as constraints that prevent colonies from adapting to their local environments.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity provides genuine explanatory power by identifying the structural mechanisms through which mother countries limit colonial development, helping explain why colonies underperform their economic potential. It illuminates the causal relationship between imperial control and economic inefficiency.

3.5 KiB Raw Blame History