Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.2 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

economic_system_theory

null

2026-02-23T05:21:29.057412

2.0

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	2.0	5.0	The definition is overly broad and circular, essentially defining "economic system theory" as "theory about economic systems." It lacks specificity about what distinguishes this particular theoretical framework from general economic analysis or methodology.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	2.0	5.0	While Smith does discuss political economy as a science, the entity extrapolates this into a comprehensive "systematic body of principles" that goes well beyond what Smith explicitly articulates. The source reference to "Book IV, Chapter 0" is also problematic as Book IV doesn't have a Chapter 0.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	3.0	5.0	"General Theory" is an appropriate domain for this type of meta-theoretical concept, though the entity might be better categorized under methodology or analytical frameworks rather than as a standalone theoretical construct.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	1.0	5.0	This entity is far too abstract and meta-theoretical to map meaningfully to any specific VSM system. It represents a conceptual umbrella rather than a functional component that could operate within a viable system structure.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	2.0	5.0	The entity adds little explanatory power beyond labeling Smith's theoretical approach. It doesn't illuminate specific mechanisms, relationships, or structural elements that would enhance understanding of how economic systems actually function or develop.

Evaluation: Economic System Theory

definition_precision — 2.0 / 5.0

The definition is overly broad and circular, essentially defining "economic system theory" as "theory about economic systems." It lacks specificity about what distinguishes this particular theoretical framework from general economic analysis or methodology.

source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0

While Smith does discuss political economy as a science, the entity extrapolates this into a comprehensive "systematic body of principles" that goes well beyond what Smith explicitly articulates. The source reference to "Book IV, Chapter 0" is also problematic as Book IV doesn't have a Chapter 0.

domain_placement — 3.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is an appropriate domain for this type of meta-theoretical concept, though the entity might be better categorized under methodology or analytical frameworks rather than as a standalone theoretical construct.

vsm_relevance — 1.0 / 5.0

This entity is far too abstract and meta-theoretical to map meaningfully to any specific VSM system. It represents a conceptual umbrella rather than a functional component that could operate within a viable system structure.

explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0

The entity adds little explanatory power beyond labeling Smith's theoretical approach. It doesn't illuminate specific mechanisms, relationships, or structural elements that would enhance understanding of how economic systems actually function or develop.

3.2 KiB Raw Blame History