Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.7 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

law_of_primogeniture

null

2026-02-23T05:40:51.298293

4.8

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	5.0	5.0	The definition is highly precise, clearly distinguishing primogeniture from other inheritance systems by specifying undivided inheritance to the eldest son and explicitly contrasting its purpose (power/protection) with mere subsistence. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct legal-economic concept.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This entity is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book III, Chapter 2, where he explicitly discusses primogeniture as a feudal inheritance law and contrasts it with Roman practices of equal division. The definition accurately reflects Smith's treatment of the concept and its historical context.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	"Regulation" is the correct domain placement, as primogeniture represents a legal framework that governs property inheritance and shapes economic behavior. It functions as an institutional rule that constrains and directs economic activity rather than being a market mechanism or production process.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents an institutional control mechanism that governs resource allocation within the economic system. It also has some S5 relevance as it embodies societal identity and policy choices about property rights and social organization.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	5.0	5.0	This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating how legal inheritance structures shape economic efficiency, land use patterns, and the concentration of wealth and power. It reveals a key mechanism through which feudal institutions perpetuated economic inefficiency despite changing circumstances.

Evaluation: Law Of Primogeniture

definition_precision — 5.0 / 5.0

The definition is highly precise, clearly distinguishing primogeniture from other inheritance systems by specifying undivided inheritance to the eldest son and explicitly contrasting its purpose (power/protection) with mere subsistence. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct legal-economic concept.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book III, Chapter 2, where he explicitly discusses primogeniture as a feudal inheritance law and contrasts it with Roman practices of equal division. The definition accurately reflects Smith's treatment of the concept and its historical context.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"Regulation" is the correct domain placement, as primogeniture represents a legal framework that governs property inheritance and shapes economic behavior. It functions as an institutional rule that constrains and directs economic activity rather than being a market mechanism or production process.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents an institutional control mechanism that governs resource allocation within the economic system. It also has some S5 relevance as it embodies societal identity and policy choices about property rights and social organization.

explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity provides significant explanatory power by illuminating how legal inheritance structures shape economic efficiency, land use patterns, and the concentration of wealth and power. It reveals a key mechanism through which feudal institutions perpetuated economic inefficiency despite changing circumstances.

3.7 KiB Raw Blame History