Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.5 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

standard_weight_of_coin

null

2026-02-23T06:24:53.662979

4.4

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly specifies what standard weight of coin means - the officially designated weight and fineness of precious metal in coins. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct, measurable concept rather than a vague umbrella term.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This concept is directly grounded in Smith's text, particularly in Book I, Chapter 5 where he extensively discusses how coins' actual weight deviates from their standard weight through wear and clipping, affecting their reliability as measures of value. Smith explicitly addresses this as a fundamental monetary issue.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	The "Regulation" domain assignment is highly appropriate since standard weight of coin represents a government regulatory standard that must be established, maintained, and enforced. This is clearly a regulatory rather than market-driven concept.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents a regulatory standard that requires monitoring and enforcement to maintain system integrity. It also has some S2 relevance as deviations from standard weight create coordination problems in exchange.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	This entity illuminates a crucial mechanism in monetary systems - how physical standards enable money to function reliably as a measure of value and medium of exchange. It explains the structural relationship between regulatory standards and monetary stability rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.

Evaluation: Standard Weight Of Coin

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly specifies what standard weight of coin means - the officially designated weight and fineness of precious metal in coins. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct, measurable concept rather than a vague umbrella term.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This concept is directly grounded in Smith's text, particularly in Book I, Chapter 5 where he extensively discusses how coins' actual weight deviates from their standard weight through wear and clipping, affecting their reliability as measures of value. Smith explicitly addresses this as a fundamental monetary issue.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Regulation" domain assignment is highly appropriate since standard weight of coin represents a government regulatory standard that must be established, maintained, and enforced. This is clearly a regulatory rather than market-driven concept.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents a regulatory standard that requires monitoring and enforcement to maintain system integrity. It also has some S2 relevance as deviations from standard weight create coordination problems in exchange.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity illuminates a crucial mechanism in monetary systems - how physical standards enable money to function reliably as a measure of value and medium of exchange. It explains the structural relationship between regulatory standards and monetary stability rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.

3.5 KiB Raw Blame History