Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.8 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

statutes_of_apprenticeship_effects

null

2026-02-23T06:25:36.532758

4.2

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly captures a specific asymmetric effect of apprenticeship laws - their ability to raise wages above natural rates during prosperity versus forcing them below during decline. The concept is distinct and well-bounded, though it could be slightly more precise about the mechanisms involved.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This entity directly reflects Smith's analysis in Book I, Chapter 7, where he explicitly discusses how apprenticeship statutes have different effects during prosperity versus decline, and notes their more durable effect in raising wages than reducing them. The temporal aspect about effects lasting only as long as workers' lives is also grounded in the source text.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	"Regulation" is the correct domain placement as this entity specifically concerns the effects of legal statutes (apprenticeship laws) on labor markets. This is clearly a regulatory mechanism rather than a natural market phenomenon.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	3.0	5.0	This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S2 (coordination) as it describes how regulations attempt to coordinate labor markets, though with unintended oscillatory effects. It also touches on S3 (internal regulation) through its regulatory mechanism, but the mapping is not as natural as more operational concepts.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	The entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating the asymmetric and temporal dynamics of how regulatory interventions affect wage determination. It reveals an important structural mechanism about how legal constraints interact with market forces over time, rather than merely describing a surface phenomenon.

Evaluation: Statutes Of Apprenticeship Effects

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly captures a specific asymmetric effect of apprenticeship laws - their ability to raise wages above natural rates during prosperity versus forcing them below during decline. The concept is distinct and well-bounded, though it could be slightly more precise about the mechanisms involved.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity directly reflects Smith's analysis in Book I, Chapter 7, where he explicitly discusses how apprenticeship statutes have different effects during prosperity versus decline, and notes their more durable effect in raising wages than reducing them. The temporal aspect about effects lasting only as long as workers' lives is also grounded in the source text.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"Regulation" is the correct domain placement as this entity specifically concerns the effects of legal statutes (apprenticeship laws) on labor markets. This is clearly a regulatory mechanism rather than a natural market phenomenon.

vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S2 (coordination) as it describes how regulations attempt to coordinate labor markets, though with unintended oscillatory effects. It also touches on S3 (internal regulation) through its regulatory mechanism, but the mapping is not as natural as more operational concepts.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating the asymmetric and temporal dynamics of how regulatory interventions affect wage determination. It reveals an important structural mechanism about how legal constraints interact with market forces over time, rather than merely describing a surface phenomenon.

3.8 KiB Raw Blame History