Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.1 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

usury

null

2026-02-23T06:36:16.735690

4.2

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	4.0	5.0	The definition clearly distinguishes usury from normal interest by emphasizing "excessively high" rates that exceed legal or economic justification. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct economic practice rather than a vague concept.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	5.0	5.0	This entity is directly grounded in Smith's actual discussion in Book II, Chapter 4, where he explicitly analyzes usury laws and their economic effects. The context accurately reflects Smith's argument about how usury prohibitions can backfire.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	"Regulation" is the correct domain placement since Smith's discussion of usury centers on legal interest rate controls and their regulatory effects. This is fundamentally about government intervention in financial markets.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	3.0	5.0	Usury maps reasonably well to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents a regulatory mechanism for controlling financial behavior within the economic system. However, the mapping is not as natural or structurally fundamental as core VSM concepts.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	The entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating the mechanism of how interest rate regulation can produce unintended consequences (driving legitimate transactions underground). It reveals an important structural relationship between legal constraints and market behavior.

Evaluation: Usury

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes usury from normal interest by emphasizing "excessively high" rates that exceed legal or economic justification. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct economic practice rather than a vague concept.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is directly grounded in Smith's actual discussion in Book II, Chapter 4, where he explicitly analyzes usury laws and their economic effects. The context accurately reflects Smith's argument about how usury prohibitions can backfire.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

"Regulation" is the correct domain placement since Smith's discussion of usury centers on legal interest rate controls and their regulatory effects. This is fundamentally about government intervention in financial markets.

vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

Usury maps reasonably well to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents a regulatory mechanism for controlling financial behavior within the economic system. However, the mapping is not as natural or structurally fundamental as core VSM concepts.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity provides genuine explanatory power by illuminating the mechanism of how interest rate regulation can produce unintended consequences (driving legitimate transactions underground). It reveals an important structural relationship between legal constraints and market behavior.

3.1 KiB Raw Blame History