Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.6 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

economic_system_implementation

null

2026-02-23T05:16:47.168866

2.4

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	2.0	5.0	The definition is overly broad and vague, essentially describing "how economic systems work in practice" without identifying any specific mechanisms or distinct conceptual boundaries. It reads more like a general description of policy implementation than a precise economic concept.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	1.0	5.0	The entity explicitly admits Smith does not discuss this concept in the referenced chapter, stating it is "implied" in his discussion - this represents a significant inferential leap rather than grounding in actual source text. Book IV, Chapter 0 would also be unusual as chapters typically start with Chapter 1.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	3.0	5.0	While "Regulation" is a reasonable domain for implementation processes, this concept is so broad it could equally belong in institutional economics, political economy, or policy studies. The domain assignment captures one aspect but doesn't reflect the entity's expansive scope.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This entity maps well to multiple VSM systems - S1 (operational implementation), S3 (internal regulation and audit of implementation), and S4 (adaptation of implementation to environment). The implementation focus gives it clear VSM applicability across several systems.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	2.0	5.0	The entity merely labels the general phenomenon of "putting economic ideas into practice" without illuminating any specific mechanisms, structural relationships, or causal processes. It adds descriptive terminology but little analytical insight into how economic systems actually function.

Evaluation: Economic System Implementation

definition_precision — 2.0 / 5.0

The definition is overly broad and vague, essentially describing "how economic systems work in practice" without identifying any specific mechanisms or distinct conceptual boundaries. It reads more like a general description of policy implementation than a precise economic concept.

source_grounding — 1.0 / 5.0

The entity explicitly admits Smith does not discuss this concept in the referenced chapter, stating it is "implied" in his discussion - this represents a significant inferential leap rather than grounding in actual source text. Book IV, Chapter 0 would also be unusual as chapters typically start with Chapter 1.

domain_placement — 3.0 / 5.0

While "Regulation" is a reasonable domain for implementation processes, this concept is so broad it could equally belong in institutional economics, political economy, or policy studies. The domain assignment captures one aspect but doesn't reflect the entity's expansive scope.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to multiple VSM systems - S1 (operational implementation), S3 (internal regulation and audit of implementation), and S4 (adaptation of implementation to environment). The implementation focus gives it clear VSM applicability across several systems.

explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0

The entity merely labels the general phenomenon of "putting economic ideas into practice" without illuminating any specific mechanisms, structural relationships, or causal processes. It adds descriptive terminology but little analytical insight into how economic systems actually function.

3.6 KiB Raw Blame History