Files
markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/servile_condition.md
tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.9 KiB

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores
entity_slug evaluator evaluated_at overall_score scores
servile_condition null 2026-02-23T06:21:05.322340 4.0
name value max_value rationale
definition_precision 4.0 5.0 The definition clearly distinguishes servile condition from other forms of labor arrangement by specifying key characteristics: lack of personal freedom, absence of property rights, subjection to lord/master authority, and control over labor and possessions. It avoids circularity and provides concrete distinguishing features.
name value max_value rationale
source_grounding 5.0 5.0 This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book III, Chapter 3, where he extensively discusses the bondage of medieval populations and contrasts urban servile conditions with rural freedom in ancient republics. The entity accurately reflects Smith's historical economic analysis.
name value max_value rationale
domain_placement 4.0 5.0 "General Theory" is appropriate as this concept represents a fundamental institutional arrangement that underpins Smith's broader theoretical framework about economic development and the transition from feudalism to commercial society. It's not merely a historical detail but a structural economic concept.
name value max_value rationale
vsm_relevance 2.0 5.0 This entity describes a historical institutional condition rather than an operational system component. While it might relate to S1 (as a constraint on primary operations) or S5 (as an identity/governance structure), it doesn't naturally map to VSM systems since it represents an external institutional constraint rather than an internal system function.
name value max_value rationale
explanatory_value 5.0 5.0 This entity provides crucial explanatory power for understanding Smith's theory of economic development, particularly how institutional arrangements constrain or enable economic progress. It illuminates the structural mechanisms that prevented efficient resource allocation and economic growth in pre-commercial societies.

Evaluation: Servile Condition

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly distinguishes servile condition from other forms of labor arrangement by specifying key characteristics: lack of personal freedom, absence of property rights, subjection to lord/master authority, and control over labor and possessions. It avoids circularity and provides concrete distinguishing features.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This concept is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book III, Chapter 3, where he extensively discusses the bondage of medieval populations and contrasts urban servile conditions with rural freedom in ancient republics. The entity accurately reflects Smith's historical economic analysis.

domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is appropriate as this concept represents a fundamental institutional arrangement that underpins Smith's broader theoretical framework about economic development and the transition from feudalism to commercial society. It's not merely a historical detail but a structural economic concept.

vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0

This entity describes a historical institutional condition rather than an operational system component. While it might relate to S1 (as a constraint on primary operations) or S5 (as an identity/governance structure), it doesn't naturally map to VSM systems since it represents an external institutional constraint rather than an internal system function.

explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity provides crucial explanatory power for understanding Smith's theory of economic development, particularly how institutional arrangements constrain or enable economic progress. It illuminates the structural mechanisms that prevented efficient resource allocation and economic growth in pre-commercial societies.