Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.2 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

bank_regulatory_compliance

null

2026-02-23T00:49:04.715687

3.0

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	3.0	5.0	The definition is reasonably clear but somewhat circular, defining compliance as "adherence to regulatory requirements" without specifying what those requirements entail. It captures a distinct concept but could be more precise about the mechanisms and scope of compliance.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	2.0	5.0	While Smith discusses banking regulation in Book II, Chapter 2, the modern concept of "regulatory compliance" as a distinct institutional practice is anachronistic for Smith's era. Smith focuses more on the principles of sound banking rather than formal compliance frameworks.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	4.0	5.0	The "Regulation" domain is appropriate since this entity deals with adherence to regulatory standards. However, it could also fit within a "Banking" or "Financial Institutions" domain given its specific focus on bank operations.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents the internal monitoring and control mechanisms that ensure adherence to external standards. It also has some relevance to S2 (coordination) in preventing systemic oscillations.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	2.0	5.0	The entity primarily names a surface phenomenon rather than illuminating underlying mechanisms. It doesn't explain how compliance actually works or what specific regulatory mechanisms Smith advocated for banking stability.

Evaluation: Bank Regulatory Compliance

definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0

The definition is reasonably clear but somewhat circular, defining compliance as "adherence to regulatory requirements" without specifying what those requirements entail. It captures a distinct concept but could be more precise about the mechanisms and scope of compliance.

source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0

While Smith discusses banking regulation in Book II, Chapter 2, the modern concept of "regulatory compliance" as a distinct institutional practice is anachronistic for Smith's era. Smith focuses more on the principles of sound banking rather than formal compliance frameworks.

domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0

The "Regulation" domain is appropriate since this entity deals with adherence to regulatory standards. However, it could also fit within a "Banking" or "Financial Institutions" domain given its specific focus on bank operations.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents the internal monitoring and control mechanisms that ensure adherence to external standards. It also has some relevance to S2 (coordination) in preventing systemic oscillations.

explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0

The entity primarily names a surface phenomenon rather than illuminating underlying mechanisms. It doesn't explain how compliance actually works or what specific regulatory mechanisms Smith advocated for banking stability.

3.2 KiB Raw Blame History