Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.5 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

colonial_economic_system_design

null

2026-02-23T04:48:02.850778

4.0

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	3.0	5.0	The definition captures a coherent concept about colonial economic governance structures, but it's somewhat broad and could be more precise about what constitutes "better system design." The connection between design principles and outcomes is stated but not deeply specified.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	4.0	5.0	This entity is well-grounded in Smith's extensive discussion of colonial policy in Book IV, Chapter 7, where he explicitly critiques existing colonial arrangements and advocates for reforms based on natural liberty principles. The source clearly addresses systematic redesign of colonial economic relationships.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	5.0	5.0	The "Regulation" domain placement is highly appropriate, as this entity directly concerns the rules, policies, and institutional frameworks that govern colonial economic activity. This is quintessentially about regulatory design and implementation.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it concerns the design of control and coordination mechanisms within colonial economic systems. It also has elements of S4 (intelligence) in terms of adapting system design based on economic principles and environmental feedback.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	4.0	5.0	The entity provides genuine explanatory power by highlighting how institutional design affects economic outcomes in colonial contexts. It illuminates the structural relationship between regulatory frameworks and market performance, going beyond mere description to suggest causal mechanisms.

Evaluation: Colonial Economic System Design

definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0

The definition captures a coherent concept about colonial economic governance structures, but it's somewhat broad and could be more precise about what constitutes "better system design." The connection between design principles and outcomes is stated but not deeply specified.

source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity is well-grounded in Smith's extensive discussion of colonial policy in Book IV, Chapter 7, where he explicitly critiques existing colonial arrangements and advocates for reforms based on natural liberty principles. The source clearly addresses systematic redesign of colonial economic relationships.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The "Regulation" domain placement is highly appropriate, as this entity directly concerns the rules, policies, and institutional frameworks that govern colonial economic activity. This is quintessentially about regulatory design and implementation.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it concerns the design of control and coordination mechanisms within colonial economic systems. It also has elements of S4 (intelligence) in terms of adapting system design based on economic principles and environmental feedback.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity provides genuine explanatory power by highlighting how institutional design affects economic outcomes in colonial contexts. It illuminates the structural relationship between regulatory frameworks and market performance, going beyond mere description to suggest causal mechanisms.

3.5 KiB Raw Blame History