Files
markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/crown_lands_revenue.md
tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.5 KiB

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores
entity_slug evaluator evaluated_at overall_score scores
crown_lands_revenue null 2026-02-23T05:04:18.835824 4.2
name value max_value rationale
definition_precision 4.0 5.0 The definition clearly specifies crown lands revenue as income from state-owned lands through rent and produce, distinguishing it from other revenue sources. It's precise and non-circular, though could be slightly more specific about the mechanisms of revenue generation.
name value max_value rationale
source_grounding 5.0 5.0 This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual text, as Book V extensively discusses various sources of public revenue including crown lands. Smith specifically analyzes how different nations have relied on crown lands as a principal revenue source and examines their management.
name value max_value rationale
domain_placement 5.0 5.0 The placement in "General Theory" domain is appropriate as this represents a fundamental category of public finance that Smith analyzes systematically. It fits naturally within his broader theoretical framework of public revenue sources rather than being a specific policy or operational detail.
name value max_value rationale
vsm_relevance 3.0 5.0 This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S1 (primary operations) as a basic revenue-generating function of the state. It could also relate to S3 (internal regulation) regarding land management, but it's not as clearly systemic as other VSM-relevant concepts.
name value max_value rationale
explanatory_value 4.0 5.0 The entity provides good explanatory value by identifying a specific mechanism of public finance and its historical importance. It illuminates how states can generate revenue through direct ownership rather than taxation, contributing to understanding of fiscal structure and state capacity.

Evaluation: Crown Lands Revenue

definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0

The definition clearly specifies crown lands revenue as income from state-owned lands through rent and produce, distinguishing it from other revenue sources. It's precise and non-circular, though could be slightly more specific about the mechanisms of revenue generation.

source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0

This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual text, as Book V extensively discusses various sources of public revenue including crown lands. Smith specifically analyzes how different nations have relied on crown lands as a principal revenue source and examines their management.

domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0

The placement in "General Theory" domain is appropriate as this represents a fundamental category of public finance that Smith analyzes systematically. It fits naturally within his broader theoretical framework of public revenue sources rather than being a specific policy or operational detail.

vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0

This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S1 (primary operations) as a basic revenue-generating function of the state. It could also relate to S3 (internal regulation) regarding land management, but it's not as clearly systemic as other VSM-relevant concepts.

explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0

The entity provides good explanatory value by identifying a specific mechanism of public finance and its historical importance. It illuminates how states can generate revenue through direct ownership rather than taxation, contributing to understanding of fiscal structure and state capacity.