Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.7 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

economic_system_development

null

2026-02-23T05:14:28.316118

3.2

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	3.0	5.0	The definition captures a coherent concept about economic evolution but remains somewhat broad and umbrella-like. While it identifies key components (emergence, modification, driving factors), it could be more precise about what constitutes "economic arrangements" and the specific mechanisms of change.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	2.0	5.0	The entity claims to derive from "Book IV, Chapter 0" which is problematic since Book IV doesn't have a Chapter 0 in Smith's work. While Smith does discuss different economic systems across nations and time periods, this specific framing of "developmental progression" may impose a more modern evolutionary perspective than Smith explicitly articulated.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	4.0	5.0	"General Theory" is an appropriate domain placement since this concept spans across Smith's various discussions of mercantilism, physiocracy, and natural liberty rather than belonging to a specific economic sector. The broad theoretical nature fits this categorization well.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it concerns how economic systems adapt and evolve in response to changing conditions over time. It could also relate to S5 (identity/policy) regarding fundamental systemic changes in economic organization.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	3.0	5.0	The entity provides moderate explanatory value by highlighting the dynamic nature of economic systems, but it remains somewhat descriptive rather than illuminating specific mechanisms. It names an important phenomenon but doesn't deeply explain the structural relations that drive economic system evolution.

Evaluation: Economic System Development

definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0

The definition captures a coherent concept about economic evolution but remains somewhat broad and umbrella-like. While it identifies key components (emergence, modification, driving factors), it could be more precise about what constitutes "economic arrangements" and the specific mechanisms of change.

source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0

The entity claims to derive from "Book IV, Chapter 0" which is problematic since Book IV doesn't have a Chapter 0 in Smith's work. While Smith does discuss different economic systems across nations and time periods, this specific framing of "developmental progression" may impose a more modern evolutionary perspective than Smith explicitly articulated.

domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is an appropriate domain placement since this concept spans across Smith's various discussions of mercantilism, physiocracy, and natural liberty rather than belonging to a specific economic sector. The broad theoretical nature fits this categorization well.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This entity maps well to S4 (intelligence/environmental adaptation) as it concerns how economic systems adapt and evolve in response to changing conditions over time. It could also relate to S5 (identity/policy) regarding fundamental systemic changes in economic organization.

explanatory_value — 3.0 / 5.0

The entity provides moderate explanatory value by highlighting the dynamic nature of economic systems, but it remains somewhat descriptive rather than illuminating specific mechanisms. It names an important phenomenon but doesn't deeply explain the structural relations that drive economic system evolution.

3.7 KiB Raw Blame History