Files

tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)

Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

3.6 KiB

Raw Blame History

entity_slug, evaluator, evaluated_at, overall_score, scores

entity_slug

evaluator

evaluated_at

overall_score

scores

economic_system_evaluation

null

2026-02-23T05:15:29.540817

3.0

name	value	max_value	rationale
definition_precision	3.0	5.0	The definition captures a coherent concept but remains somewhat broad and umbrella-like. While it identifies specific criteria (outcomes, effectiveness, achieving political economy objectives), it could be more precise about what constitutes "assessment" versus other forms of analysis.

name	value	max_value	rationale
source_grounding	2.0	5.0	While Smith certainly evaluates different economic systems throughout the work, he doesn't explicitly articulate a formal framework for "economic system evaluation" as a distinct methodological concept. This appears to be an analytical abstraction imposed on Smith's comparative discussions rather than a concept he directly presents.

name	value	max_value	rationale
domain_placement	4.0	5.0	"General Theory" is appropriate since this represents a meta-analytical framework that would apply across Smith's various discussions of mercantilism, physiocracy, and natural liberty. It's correctly positioned as a theoretical tool rather than a specific economic mechanism.

name	value	max_value	rationale
vsm_relevance	4.0	5.0	This maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents the monitoring and assessment function that evaluates system performance against objectives. It could also relate to S4 (intelligence) in terms of learning from different system outcomes.

name	value	max_value	rationale
explanatory_value	2.0	5.0	This entity names Smith's comparative methodology but doesn't illuminate specific mechanisms or structural relations within economic systems themselves. It's more of a meta-commentary on Smith's analytical approach than a substantive economic concept that advances understanding of wealth creation.

Evaluation: Economic System Evaluation

definition_precision — 3.0 / 5.0

The definition captures a coherent concept but remains somewhat broad and umbrella-like. While it identifies specific criteria (outcomes, effectiveness, achieving political economy objectives), it could be more precise about what constitutes "assessment" versus other forms of analysis.

source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0

While Smith certainly evaluates different economic systems throughout the work, he doesn't explicitly articulate a formal framework for "economic system evaluation" as a distinct methodological concept. This appears to be an analytical abstraction imposed on Smith's comparative discussions rather than a concept he directly presents.

domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0

"General Theory" is appropriate since this represents a meta-analytical framework that would apply across Smith's various discussions of mercantilism, physiocracy, and natural liberty. It's correctly positioned as a theoretical tool rather than a specific economic mechanism.

vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0

This maps well to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as it represents the monitoring and assessment function that evaluates system performance against objectives. It could also relate to S4 (intelligence) in terms of learning from different system outcomes.

explanatory_value — 2.0 / 5.0

This entity names Smith's comparative methodology but doesn't illuminate specific mechanisms or structural relations within economic systems themselves. It's more of a meta-commentary on Smith's analytical approach than a substantive economic concept that advances understanding of wealth creation.

3.6 KiB Raw Blame History